Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Expectant management of veterans with early-stage prostate cancer.
Filson, Christopher P; Shelton, Jeremy B; Tan, Hung-Jui; Kwan, Lorna; Skolarus, Ted A; Saigal, Christopher S; Litwin, Mark S.
Afiliação
  • Filson CP; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Shelton JB; Veterans Affairs Atlanta Healthcare System, Decatur, Georgia.
  • Tan HJ; Department of Urology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Kwan L; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
  • Skolarus TA; Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California.
  • Saigal CS; Center for Clinical Management Research, Health Services Research and Development Service, Veterans Affairs Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
  • Litwin MS; Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Cancer ; 122(4): 626-33, 2016 Feb 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26540451
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

For certain men with low-risk prostate cancer, aggressive treatment results in marginal survival benefits while exposing them to urinary and sexual side effects. Nevertheless, expectant management has been underused. In the current study, the authors evaluated the association between various factors and expectant management use among veterans diagnosed with prostate cancer.

METHODS:

The authors identified men diagnosed with prostate cancer in 2008. The outcome of interest was use of expectant management, based on documentation captured through an in-depth chart review. Multivariable regression models were fit to examine associations between use of expectant management and patient demographics, cancer severity, and facility characteristics. The authors assessed variation across 21 tertiary care regions and 52 facilities by generating predicted probabilities for receipt of expectant management.

RESULTS:

Expectant management was more common among patients aged ≥75 years (40% vs 27% for those aged < 55 years; odds ratio, 2.57) and those with low-risk tumors (49% vs 20% for patients with high-risk tumors; odds ratio, 5.35). There was no association noted between patient comorbidity and receipt of expectant management (P = .90). There were also no associations found between facility factors and use of expectant management (all P>.05). Among ideal candidates for expectant management, receipt of expectant management varied considerably across individual facilities (0%-85%; P<.001).

CONCLUSIONS:

Patient age and tumor risk were found to be more strongly associated with use of expectant management than patient comorbidity. Although use of expectant management appears broadly appropriate, there was variation in expectant management noted between hospitals that was apparently not attributable to facility factors. Research determining the basis of this variation, with a focus on providers, will be critical to help optimize prostate cancer treatment for veterans.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Veteranos / Padrões de Prática Médica / Calicreínas / Antígeno Prostático Específico / Conduta Expectante Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Veteranos / Padrões de Prática Médica / Calicreínas / Antígeno Prostático Específico / Conduta Expectante Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article