Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The effect of diabetes and metformin on clinical outcomes is negligible in risk-adjusted endometrial cancer cohorts.
Al Hilli, Mariam M; Bakkum-Gamez, Jamie N; Mariani, Andrea; Cliby, William A; Mc Gree, Michaela E; Weaver, Amy L; Dowdy, Sean C; Podratz, Karl C.
Afiliação
  • Al Hilli MM; Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
  • Bakkum-Gamez JN; Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
  • Mariani A; Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
  • Cliby WA; Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
  • Mc Gree ME; Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
  • Weaver AL; Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
  • Dowdy SC; Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States.
  • Podratz KC; Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States. Electronic address: podratz.karl@mayo.edu.
Gynecol Oncol ; 140(2): 270-6, 2016 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26607780
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To examine the influence of diabetes and metformin therapy on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) by using propensity score (PS) matching to account for confounding factors.

METHODS:

We retrospectively identified consecutive patients with stage I-IV EC managed surgically from 1999 through 2008 and stratified patients by diabetes status. PS matching was used to adjust for confounding covariates. OS and PFS were compared between diabetic and nondiabetic matched pairs and between matched pairs of diabetic patients with or without metformin therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were fit to estimate the effects on outcomes.

RESULTS:

Among 1303 eligible patients (79% stage I, 28% grade 3), 277 (21.3%) had a history of diabetes. Among diabetic patients, treatment consisted of metformin in 116 (41.9%); 57 (20.6%) had other oral agents, 51 (18.4%) insulin with or without other oral agents, and 53 (19.1%) diet modification only. For PS-matched diabetic and nondiabetic patients with EC, OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.01; 95% CI, 0.72-1.42) and PFS (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.60-1.69) were similar between matched subsets. No differences in OS and PFS were observed when comparing PS-matched metformin users with nondiabetic patients (OS HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.57-1.85; PFS HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.49-2.62) or with other diabetic patients (OS HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.30-1.23; PFS HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.34-3.30).

CONCLUSIONS:

When adjusted for confounding covariates, OS and PFS are similar between diabetic and nondiabetic patients with EC and between metformin users and nonusers or nondiabetic patients.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Endométrio / Diabetes Mellitus / Hipoglicemiantes / Metformina Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias do Endométrio / Diabetes Mellitus / Hipoglicemiantes / Metformina Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Gynecol Oncol Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos