Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Pre- and post-ESD discrepancies in clinicopathologic criteria in early gastric cancer: the NECA-Korea ESD for Early Gastric Cancer Prospective Study (N-Keep).
Kim, Joon Mee; Sohn, Jin Hee; Cho, Mee-Yon; Kim, Woo Ho; Chang, Hee Kyung; Jung, Eun Sun; Kook, Myeong-Cherl; Jin, So-Young; Chae, Yang Seok; Park, Young Soo; Kang, Mi Seon; Kim, Hyunki; Lee, Jae Hyuk; Park, Do Youn; Kim, Kyoung Mee; Kim, Hoguen; Kim, Youn Wha; Hwang, Seung-Sik; Seol, Sang Yong; Jung, Hwoon-Yong; Lee, Na Rae; Park, Seung-Hee; You, Ji Hye.
Afiliação
  • Kim JM; Department of Pathology, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • Sohn JH; Department of Pathology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 108, Pyung-Dong, Jongro-Ku, Seoul, 110-102, Korea. jhpath.sohn@samsung.com.
  • Cho MY; Yonsei University Wonju Christian Hospital, Wonju, Korea.
  • Kim WH; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Chang HK; Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
  • Jung ES; College of Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kook MC; National Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • Jin SY; Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • Chae YS; Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park YS; University of Ulsan College of Medicine Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kang MS; Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • Kim H; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee JH; Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital, Hwasun-Gun, Korea.
  • Park DY; Pusan National University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea.
  • Kim KM; Sungkyunkwan University Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim H; Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Kim YW; Kyunghee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Hwang SS; Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea.
  • Seol SY; Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
  • Jung HY; Department of Gastroenterology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Asan Digestive Disease Research Institute, Seoul, Korea.
  • Lee NR; National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park SH; National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.
  • You JH; National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency, Seoul, Korea.
Gastric Cancer ; 19(4): 1104-1113, 2016 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26621523
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Discrepancies in the clinicopathologic parameters pre- and post-endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) sometimes necessitate additional surgical resection. The aim of this study was to assess such discrepancies in clinicopathologic parameters before and after ESD in the context of reducing the risk of failure of curative ESD.

METHODS:

Data on 712 early gastric cancer patients were prospectively collected from 12 university hospitals nationwide. The inclusion criteria were differentiated carcinoma <3 cm in size, no ulceration, submucosal invasion <500 µm, and no metastasis. Clinicopathologic factors were compared retrospectively.

RESULTS:

The discrepancy rate was 20.1 % (148/737) and the most common cause of discrepancy was tumor size (64 cases, 8.7 %). Ulceration, undifferentiated histology, and SM2 invasion were found in 34 (4.6 %), 18 (2.4 %), and 51 cases (6.9 %), respectively. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was observed in 34 cases (4.6 %). Cases with lesions exceeding 3 cm in size showed more frequent submucosal invasion, an elevated gross morphology, and upper and middle locations (p < 0.05). In the cases with ulceration, depth of invasion (DOI) was deeper than in the cases without ulceration (p = 0.005). Differentiation was correlated with DOI and LVI (p = 0.021 and 0.007). DOI was correlated with tumor size, ulceration, differentiation, LVI, gross type, and location. There were statistically significant differences between mucosal cancer cases and submucosal cancer cases in tumor size, differentiation, ulceration, LVI, and location.

CONCLUSIONS:

The overall discrepancy rate was 20.1 %. To reduce this rate, it is necessary to evaluate the DOI very cautiously, because it is correlated with other parameters. In particular, careful checking for SM-invasive cancer is required due to the high incidence of LVI irrespective of the depth of submucosal invasion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Adenocarcinoma / Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa / Gastrectomia / Mucosa Gástrica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Gastric Cancer Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Gástricas / Adenocarcinoma / Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa / Gastrectomia / Mucosa Gástrica Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Gastric Cancer Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article