Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Oral antibody to interleukin-10 reduces growth rate depression due to Eimeria spp. infection in broiler chickens.
Sand, Jordan M; Arendt, Maria K; Repasy, Alec; Deniz, Gulay; Cook, Mark E.
Afiliação
  • Sand JM; Animal Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
  • Arendt MK; Animal Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI Comparative Biosciences Graduate Program, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
  • Repasy A; Animal Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.
  • Deniz G; Uludag University, Gorukle/Bursa, Turkey.
  • Cook ME; Animal Sciences Department, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI mcook@wisc.edu.
Poult Sci ; 95(2): 439-46, 2016 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26772659
ABSTRACT
Eimeria spp. must be controlled in floor-reared poultry to prevent the onset of coccidiosis. Here we use an oral antibody to chicken IL-10 to prevent growth depression due to Eimeria spp. infection. Egg antibody directed against an antigenic peptide of IL-10 was produced in laying hens and measured using an ELISA. In the first experiment, egg yolk powder containing antibody to chicken IL-10 (vlpramqt conjugate) (anti-IL-10 yolk powder) was fed at 3.4 g/kg feed to determine growth response following mixed Eimeria spp. challenge. Chicks were fed either anti-IL-10 antibodies or control antibodies and challenged (d3) with either sterile saline or a 10× attenuated Eimeria spp. vaccine. Control-fed and Eimeria-challenged chicks grew 8.8% slower than those challenged with saline (P < 0.04), whereas anti-IL-10-fed Eimeria challenged chicks were not different from untreated controls. In the second trial a dose response was performed with doses of either 0 (control antibody), 0.34-, or 3.4-g anti-IL-10 yolk powder/kg feed. Control-fed, Eimeria-challenged chicks grew 10.6% slower than control saline-challenged chicks (P < 0.05); however, anti-IL-10-fed chicks fed either dose of anti-IL-10 were not different from saline-challenged chicks. Finally, the effect of anti-IL-10 on acquired immunity was investigated. Chicks were fed control or anti-IL-10 yolk powder and vaccinated with a 1× dose of Eimeria vaccine at d 3. After 14 d, antibody was removed from the diet. Chicks were either saline or 10× Eimeria challenged at d 17. We found that the anti-IL-10-fed chickens did not show a reduction in growth due to challenge; hence anti-IL-10 does not appear to affect adaptive immunity during the primary immunization. Overall, use of an antibody to IL-10 is a novel method in preventing adverse effects of Eimeria spp. infection in poultry.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças das Aves Domésticas / Anticorpos Antiprotozoários / Galinhas / Interleucina-10 / Coccidiose / Proteínas Aviárias Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Poult Sci Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doenças das Aves Domésticas / Anticorpos Antiprotozoários / Galinhas / Interleucina-10 / Coccidiose / Proteínas Aviárias Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Poult Sci Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article