[Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery for early-stage endometrial cancer].

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the short- term and long- term outcomes after laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional laparotomy in patients with stage I-II endometrial cancer. METHODS: A retrospective study of population among 673 patientsfor early-stage endometrial cancer between Jan. 2007 and May 2014 was involved from 6 third-grade class-A communal hospitals in Guangxi. Three hundred and seventy-six cases were performed by laparoscopy, 297 cases by laparotomy. The t-test and χ(2) test was used to compare the short-term and long-term outcomes. The short-term outcomes including surgical related outcomes and operative complications, the long- term outcomes including quality of life (pelvic floor functions and sexual functions), survival analysis and recurrence. The International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire Female Lower Urinary Tract Sympotom (ICIQ- FLUTS) and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) were used to assess pelvic floor function and sexual function. Survival rates were estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The survival curves were compared by log-rank test. Cox regression analysis was used to select the risk factors for prognosis. RESULTS: (1) The short-term outcomes: There were significant difference in operative time [(258±71) vs (226±69) minutes], estimated blood loss [(343± 211) vs (491±411) ml], anus exhausting time [(2.3±0.9) vs (2.9±1.0) days], preserved days of installing catheter [(7 ± 5) vs (10±8) days], post- operative length of stay [(12 ± 7) vs (18 ± 12) days] between laparoscopic group andlaparotomy group (all P <0.05). While, there was no significant difference in lymph nodes yielded (21±8 vs 21±11; P>0.05),the intra-operative complications occurred [8.5%(32/376) vs 10.4%(31/297); P>0.05], and the post-operative complications [18.1% (68/376) vs 22.2% (66/297); P>0.05] between laparoscopic group and laparotomy group. However, the complications of vascular injury and the poor wound healing in laparoscopic group were respectively lower than those in laparotomy group [1.9%(7/376) vs 5.4% (16/297), P=0.003; and 0.3% (1/376) vs 4.7% (14/297), P<0.01]. (2) The long- term outcomes: There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS) and the degree of incontinence in ICIQ-FLUTS questionnaire between the two groups (all P >0.05). The sexual desire and sexual satisfaction scores dimension after 12 months of post- operative in FSFI questionnaire in the laparoscopic group were higher than those in laparotomy group (all P <0.05). However, there were no significant differences in sexual arousal, vaginal lubrication, orgasm and sexual pain dimension scores between the two groups (all P >0.05). The recurrence rate was 12.0%(45/376) in laparoscopic group and 14.5%(43/297) in laparotomy group (P= 0.269). The 5-year OS was 89.5% in the laparoscopic group and 87.2% in the open group (P >0.05) , and the 5-year free-progression survival rate was 87.9% in the laparoscopic group and 85.1% in the open group (P >0.05). (3) Prognostic factors in laparoscopic group The univariate analysis shown that pathological type, surgical pathological staging, deep myometrial invasion, and retroperitoneal lymph node-positive were significantly affected prognosis in laparoscopic group (all P<0.01). The multivariate analyses showed that pathological type and surgical pathological stage were the independent prognostic factors (all P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopy could reduce estimated blood loss, accelerate postoperative recovery and improve the quality of life after surgery compared to laparotomy, also ensure the same oncologically results as that by laparotomy. So, laparoscopic approach is a safe and effective treatment method for early- stage endometrial cancer.