Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cluster randomized trial assessing the effects of rapid ethical assessment on informed consent comprehension in a low-resource setting.
Addissie, Adamu; Abay, Serebe; Feleke, Yeweyenhareg; Newport, Melanie; Farsides, Bobbie; Davey, Gail.
Afiliação
  • Addissie A; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK. adamuaddis@yahoo.com.
  • Abay S; Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. adamuaddis@yahoo.com.
  • Feleke Y; Ethiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Newport M; Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
  • Farsides B; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
  • Davey G; Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK.
BMC Med Ethics ; 17(1): 40, 2016 07 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27406063
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Maximizing comprehension is a major challenge for informed consent processes in low-literacy and resource-limited settings. Application of rapid qualitative assessments to improve the informed consent process is increasingly considered useful. This study assessed the effects of Rapid Ethical Assessment (REA) on comprehension, retention and quality of the informed consent process.

METHODS:

A cluster randomized trial was conducted among participants of HPV sero-prevalence study in two districts of Northern Ethiopia, in 2013. A total of 300 study participants, 150 in the intervention and 150 in the control group, were included in the study. For the intervention group, the informed consent process was designed with further revisions based on REA findings. Informed consent comprehension levels and quality of the consent process were measured using the Modular Informed Consent Comprehension Assessment (MICCA) and Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) process assessment tools, respectively.

RESULT:

Study recruitment rates were 88.7 % and 80.7 % (p = 0.05), while study retention rates were 85.7 % and 70.3 % (p < 0.005) for the intervention and control groups respectively. Overall, the mean informed consent comprehension scores for the intervention and control groups were 73.1 % and 45.2 %, respectively, with a mean difference in comprehension score of 27.9 % (95 % CI 24.0 % - 33.4 %; p < 0.001,). Mean scores for quality of informed consent for the intervention and control groups were 89.1 % and 78.5 %, respectively, with a mean difference of 10.5 % (95 % CI 6.8 -14.2 %; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION:

Levels of informed consent comprehension, quality of the consent process, study recruitment and retention rates were significantly improved in the intervention group. We recommend REA as a potential modality to improve informed consent comprehension and quality of informed consent process in low resource settings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Seleção de Pacientes / Análise Ética / Compreensão / Pesquisa Biomédica / Países em Desenvolvimento / Recursos em Saúde / Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Ethics Assunto da revista: ETICA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Seleção de Pacientes / Análise Ética / Compreensão / Pesquisa Biomédica / Países em Desenvolvimento / Recursos em Saúde / Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy País/Região como assunto: Africa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Med Ethics Assunto da revista: ETICA Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido