Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A systematic review of interventions to improve adherence to statin medication: What do we know about what works?
Rash, Joshua A; Campbell, David J T; Tonelli, Marcello; Campbell, Tavis S.
Afiliação
  • Rash JA; Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
  • Campbell DJ; Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
  • Tonelli M; Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada.
  • Campbell TS; Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive N.W., Calgary, AB T2N 1N4, Canada. Electronic address: t.s.campbell@ucalgary.ca.
Prev Med ; 90: 155-69, 2016 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27413005
ABSTRACT
Suboptimal adherence to statin medication is common and leads to serious negative health consequences but may respond to intervention. This review evaluated the effectiveness of interventions intended to improve adherence to statin medication. Data sources included peer-reviewed publications from Cochrane Register of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs), PubMed, CINAHL, and EMBase indexed between 01 October 2008 and 18 October 2015 and studies from reference lists and technical experts. RCTs that evaluated an intervention targeting adherence to self-administered statin medication for primary or secondary prevention were eligible. Two investigators independently reviewed trials, extracted data, and evaluated risk of bias. Twenty-nine RCTs reporting on 39,769 patients met inclusion. Identified RCTs exhibited methodological weaknesses all but one failed to set inclusion parameters for medication adherence; nearly half lacked sufficient power to detect meaningful effects; and the majority had a risk of bias. Interventions were categorized into five classes (simplification of regimen, prescription cost coverage, reminders, education and information, and multi-faceted) and effects were pooled within each class. Prescription cost coverage, Hedges' g=0.15, 95%CI [0.110.21], simplification of drug regimen, Hedges' g=0.38, 95%CI [0.220.55], the provision of education, Hedges' g=0.19, 95%CI [0.010.37], and the use of multi-faceted interventions, Hedges' g=0.16, 95%CI [0.050.27], had small positive effects on statin adherence relative to usual care and reminders were promising, Hedges' g=0.0.27, 95%CI [-0.050.60]. In conclusion, there are some successful interventions to improve adherence to statin medication but the effects are small and additional methodologically rigorous trials are needed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases / Medicina Baseada em Evidências / Adesão à Medicação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases / Medicina Baseada em Evidências / Adesão à Medicação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Prev Med Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Canadá