Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How does the timing of chemotherapy affect outcome following radical surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma?
Sharkey, Annabel J; O'Byrne, Kenneth J; Nakas, Apostolos; Tenconi, Sara; Fennell, Dean A; Waller, David A.
Afiliação
  • Sharkey AJ; University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK. Electronic address: a.sharkey@hotmail.co.uk.
  • O'Byrne KJ; Princess Alexandra Hospital, Queensland University of Technology, Translational Research Institute, Brisbane, Australia.
  • Nakas A; University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Tenconi S; IRCCS Arcispedale, Reggio Emilia, Italy.
  • Fennell DA; University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.
  • Waller DA; University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Lung Cancer ; 100: 5-13, 2016 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27597274
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

There is little evidence regarding the use of chemotherapy as part of multimodality treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We aimed to determine whether, in those patients fit for chemotherapy, a delay in this treatment affected survival. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We analysed postoperative variables of 229 patients undergoing either extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) (81 patients) or extended pleurectomy-decortication (EPD) (197 patients) for MPM at a single centre. There was no standard protocol for additional chemotherapy and varied with referral centre. Outcome was compared between 4 chemotherapy strategies true adjuvant therapy, neo-adjuvant therapy, therapy reserved until evidence of disease progression in those otherwise fit in the post-operative setting, and those unfit for chemotherapy.

RESULTS:

There was no effect of the timing of chemotherapy on overall or progression free survival in patients fit enough for treatment (p=0.39 and p=0.33 respectively). However delaying chemotherapy until evidence of disease progression in patients with non-epithelioid disease had a detrimental effect on overall survival (OS), and on progression free survival (PFS) in lymph node positive patients (15.6 vs. 8.2 months p=0.001, and 14.9 vs. 6.0 months p=0.016). Further analysis of 169 patients receiving platinum/pemetrexed as first line treatment, showed similar results; there was no effect of the timing of chemotherapy on OS or PFS (p=0.80 and p=0.53 respectively) and an improved OS in patients with non-epithelioid disease, and improved PFS in those with lymph node metastases, if chemotherapy was given in the immediate adjuvant setting (p=0.001 and 0.038) when therapy was not delayed until disease progression.

CONCLUSION:

Our results suggest that the timing of additional chemotherapy may be important in those with a poorer prognosis on the basis of cell type and nodal stage. In these patients additional postoperative chemotherapy should not be delayed.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pleurais / Terapia Combinada / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Mesotelioma Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Lung Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pleurais / Terapia Combinada / Neoplasias Pulmonares / Mesotelioma Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Lung Cancer Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2016 Tipo de documento: Article