Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Active animal health surveillance in European Union Member States: gaps and opportunities.
Bisdorff, B; Schauer, B; Taylor, N; Rodríguez-Prieto, V; Comin, A; Brouwer, A; Dórea, F; Drewe, J; Hoinville, L; Lindberg, A; Martinez Avilés, M; Martínez-López, B; Peyre, M; Pinto Ferreira, J; Rushton, J; VAN Schaik, G; Stärk, K D C; Staubach, C; Vicente-Rubiano, M; Witteveen, G; Pfeiffer, D; Häsler, B.
Afiliação
  • Bisdorff B; Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group,Royal Veterinary College (RVC),Hatfield, North Mymms,UK.
  • Schauer B; Institute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI),Greifswald-Insel Riems,Germany.
  • Taylor N; Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group,Royal Veterinary College (RVC),Hatfield, North Mymms,UK.
  • Rodríguez-Prieto V; VISAVET Centre,Veterinary faculty,Complutense University (UCM),Madrid,Spain.
  • Comin A; Swedish Zoonosis Centre Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology,National Veterinary Institute (SVA),Uppsala,Sweden.
  • Brouwer A; Department of Epidemiological Sciences,Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA),Weybridge,UK.
  • Dórea F; Swedish Zoonosis Centre Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology,National Veterinary Institute (SVA),Uppsala,Sweden.
  • Drewe J; Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group,Royal Veterinary College (RVC),Hatfield, North Mymms,UK.
  • Hoinville L; Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group,Royal Veterinary College (RVC),Hatfield, North Mymms,UK.
  • Lindberg A; Swedish Zoonosis Centre Department of Disease Control and Epidemiology,National Veterinary Institute (SVA),Uppsala,Sweden.
  • Martinez Avilés M; VISAVET Centre,Veterinary faculty,Complutense University (UCM),Madrid,Spain.
  • Martínez-López B; VISAVET Centre,Veterinary faculty,Complutense University (UCM),Madrid,Spain.
  • Peyre M; AGIRs-Animal and Integrated Risk Management Research Unit, CIRAD-French Agricultural Research Center for International Development,Montpellier,France.
  • Pinto Ferreira J; SAFOSO AG,Liebefeld,Switzerland.
  • Rushton J; Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group,Royal Veterinary College (RVC),Hatfield, North Mymms,UK.
  • VAN Schaik G; Department of Research and Development,GD Animal Health,Deventer,The Netherlands.
  • Stärk KD; SAFOSO AG,Liebefeld,Switzerland.
  • Staubach C; Institute of Epidemiology, Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut (FLI),Greifswald-Insel Riems,Germany.
  • Vicente-Rubiano M; VISAVET Centre,Veterinary faculty,Complutense University (UCM),Madrid,Spain.
  • Witteveen G; Department of Research and Development,GD Animal Health,Deventer,The Netherlands.
  • Pfeiffer D; Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group,Royal Veterinary College (RVC),Hatfield, North Mymms,UK.
  • Häsler B; Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics and Public Health Group,Royal Veterinary College (RVC),Hatfield, North Mymms,UK.
Epidemiol Infect ; 145(4): 802-817, 2017 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27938416
ABSTRACT
Animal health surveillance enables the detection and control of animal diseases including zoonoses. Under the EU-FP7 project RISKSUR, a survey was conducted in 11 EU Member States and Switzerland to describe active surveillance components in 2011 managed by the public or private sector and identify gaps and opportunities. Information was collected about hazard, target population, geographical focus, legal obligation, management, surveillance design, risk-based sampling, and multi-hazard surveillance. Two countries were excluded due to incompleteness of data. Most of the 664 components targeted cattle (26·7%), pigs (17·5%) or poultry (16·0%). The most common surveillance objectives were demonstrating freedom from disease (43·8%) and case detection (26·8%). Over half of components applied risk-based sampling (57·1%), but mainly focused on a single population stratum (targeted risk-based) rather than differentiating between risk levels of different strata (stratified risk-based). About a third of components were multi-hazard (37·3%). Both risk-based sampling and multi-hazard surveillance were used more frequently in privately funded components. The study identified several gaps (e.g. lack of systematic documentation, inconsistent application of terminology) and opportunities (e.g. stratified risk-based sampling). The greater flexibility provided by the new EU Animal Health Law means that systematic evaluation of surveillance alternatives will be required to optimize cost-effectiveness.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitoramento Epidemiológico / Doenças dos Animais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Epidemiol Infect Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / EPIDEMIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Monitoramento Epidemiológico / Doenças dos Animais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Animals País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Epidemiol Infect Assunto da revista: DOENCAS TRANSMISSIVEIS / EPIDEMIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido