Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A pragmatic examination of active and passive recruitment methods to improve the reach of community lifestyle programs: The Talking Health Trial.
Estabrooks, Paul; You, Wen; Hedrick, Valisa; Reinholt, Margaret; Dohm, Erin; Zoellner, Jamie.
Afiliação
  • Estabrooks P; Department of Health Promotion, Social and Behavioral Health, University of Nebraska Medical Center, 984365 Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, 68198-4365, USA. paul.estabrooks@unmc.edu.
  • You W; Department of Applied and Agricultural Economics, Virginia Tech, 304 Hutcheson Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
  • Hedrick V; Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 335A Wallace Hall, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, 24061, USA.
  • Reinholt M; Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 1981 Kraft Drive, 1031 ILSB, Blacksburg, VA, 24060, USA.
  • Dohm E; Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 1981 Kraft Drive, 1031 ILSB, Blacksburg, VA, 24060, USA.
  • Zoellner J; Department of Human Nutrition, Foods, and Exercise, Virginia Tech, 1981 Kraft Drive, 1031 ILSB, Blacksburg, VA, 24060, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act ; 14(1): 7, 2017 01 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28103935
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A primary challenge for behavior change strategies is ensuring that interventions can be effective while also attracting a broad and representative sample of the target population. The purpose of this case-study was to report on (1) the reach of a randomized controlled trial targeting reduced sugary beverages, (2) potential participant characteristic differences based on active versus passive recruitment strategies, and (3) recruitment strategy cost.

METHODS:

Demographic and recruitment information was obtained for 8 counties and for individuals screened for participation. Personnel activities and time were tracked. Costs were calculated and compared by active versus passive recruitment.

RESULTS:

Six-hundred and twenty, of 1,056 screened, individuals were eligible and 301enrolled (77% women; 90% white; mean income $21,981 ± 16,443). Eighty-two and 44% of those responding to passive and active methods, respectively, enrolled in the trial. However, active recruitment strategies yielded considerably more enrolled (active = 199; passive = 102) individuals. Passive recruitment strategies yielded a less representative sample in terms of gender (more women), education (higher), and income (higher; p's <0.05). The average cost of an actively recruited and enrolled participant was $278 compared to $117 for a passively recruited and enrolled participant.

CONCLUSIONS:

Though passive recruitment is more cost efficient it may reduce the reach of sugary drink reduction strategies in lower educated and economic residents in rural communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov; ID NCT02193009 , July 2014, retrospectively registered.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / Características de Residência / Comunicação / Seleção de Pacientes / Dieta / Promoção da Saúde / Estilo de Vida Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / Características de Residência / Comunicação / Seleção de Pacientes / Dieta / Promoção da Saúde / Estilo de Vida Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos