Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Histogram analysis of volume-based apparent diffusion coefficient in breast cancer.
Park, Ga Eun; Kim, Sung Hun; Kim, Eun Jeong; Kang, Bong Joo; Park, Mi Sun.
Afiliação
  • Park GE; 1 Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim SH; 1 Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim EJ; 1 Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang BJ; 1 Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Park MS; 2 Department of Biostatistics, Clinical Research Coordinating Center, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Acta Radiol ; 58(11): 1294-1302, 2017 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28273747
ABSTRACT
Background Breast cancer is a heterogeneous disease. Recent studies showed that apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values have various association with tumor aggressiveness and prognosis. Purpose To evaluate the value of histogram analysis of ADC values obtained from the whole tumor volume in invasive ductal cancer (IDC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Material and Methods This retrospective study included 201 patients with confirmed DCIS (n = 37) and IDC (n = 164). The IDC group was divided into two groups based on the presence of a DCIS component IDC-DCIS (n = 76) and pure IDC (n = 88). All patients underwent preoperative breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with diffusion-weighted images at 3.0 T. Histogram parameters of cumulative ADC values, skewness, and kurtosis were calculated and statistically analyzed. Results The differences between DCIS, IDC-DCIS, and pure IDC were significant in all percentiles of ADC values, in descending order of DCIS, IDC-DCIS, and pure IDC. IDC showed significantly lower ADC values than DCIS, and ADC50 was the best indicator for discriminating IDC from DCIS, with a threshold of 1.185 × 10-3 mm2/s (sensitivity of 82.9%, specificity of 75.7%). However, multivariate analysis of obtained ADC values showed no significant differences between DCIS, IDC-DCIS, and pure IDC ( P > 0.05). Conclusion Volume-based ADC values showed association with heterogeneity of breast cancer. However, there was no additional diagnostic performance in histogram analysis for differentiating between DCIS, IDC-DCIS, and pure IDC.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética / Carga Tumoral Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Carcinoma Ductal de Mama / Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante / Imagem de Difusão por Ressonância Magnética / Carga Tumoral Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Acta Radiol Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article