Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Decreased relapsed rate and treatment-related mortality contribute to improved outcomes for pediatric acute myeloid leukemia in successive clinical trials.
Alexander, Thomas B; Wang, Lei; Inaba, Hiroto; Triplett, Brandon M; Pounds, Stanley; Ribeiro, Raul C; Pui, Ching-Hon; Rubnitz, Jeffrey E.
Afiliação
  • Alexander TB; Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
  • Wang L; Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
  • Inaba H; Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
  • Triplett BM; Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
  • Pounds S; Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.
  • Ribeiro RC; Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
  • Pui CH; Department of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
  • Rubnitz JE; Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee.
Cancer ; 123(19): 3791-3798, 2017 Oct 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28556917
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Outcomes for children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have improved over the past 20 years even though the medications used for induction therapy have not changed.

METHODS:

This study analyzed data from patients with AML who were enrolled in successive protocols (AML97 and AML02) to determine the contributors to the improved outcomes of the latter clinical trial.

RESULTS:

There were significant improvements in 5-year overall survival (48.9% vs 71.2%; P < .0001) and event-free survival (43.5% vs 61.8%; P = .002) from AML97 to AML02. The 5-year cumulative incidence of early death (ED)/treatment-related mortality (TRM) was reduced for patients treated in AML02 (18.5% vs 7.9%; P = .007). Although the overall incidence of refractory disease (6.5% vs 5.6%; P = .736) and relapse (29.3% vs 21.0%; P = .12) did not differ between the 2 studies, patients with low-risk AML who were treated in AML02 had a reduced incidence of relapse (27.3% vs 8.8%; P = .036).

CONCLUSIONS:

The improved outcomes of the AML02 trial resulted from improved disease control for low-risk patients and overall decreased ED/TRM. These results emphasize the importance of supportive-care measures throughout chemotherapy courses and hematopoietic cell transplantation and the value of treatment intensity for patients with low-risk AML while underscoring the need for novel therapy, rather than increased therapy intensity, for children with high-risk AML. Cancer 2017;1233791-3798. © 2017 American Cancer Society.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Leucemia Mieloide Aguda / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Quimioterapia de Indução / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Leucemia Mieloide Aguda / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Quimioterapia de Indução / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male / Newborn Idioma: En Revista: Cancer Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article