Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The impact of trabecular metal on hip centre of rotation in revision and complex primary hip arthroplasty, a radiological review.
O'Brien, Carl; Keogh, Cillian J; Hannigan, Ailish; Brennan, Stephen; Kennedy, Cian; Gul, Rehan; Harty, James A.
Afiliação
  • O'Brien C; Department of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Cork - Republic of Ireland.
  • Keogh CJ; Department of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Cork - Republic of Ireland.
  • Hannigan A; Department of Statistics, Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Cork - Republic of Ireland.
  • Brennan S; Department of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Cork - Republic of Ireland.
  • Kennedy C; Department of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Cork - Republic of Ireland.
  • Gul R; Department of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Cork - Republic of Ireland.
  • Harty JA; Department of Orthopaedics, Cork University Hospital, Cork - Republic of Ireland.
Hip Int ; 27(5): 500-504, 2017 Sep 19.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28708201
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a very successful procedure. Revision THA is becoming increasingly common. Recent developments to improve outcomes include the development of large trabecular metal (TM) acetabular cups and augments. There is a paucity of data on the benefit of these new techniques.

METHODS:

A single-centre retrospective review consisting of a radiological review of post-op revision THA anteroposterior pelvis. Data collection was performed using the Irish National Orthopaedic Register (INOR) and from a previous project. We used a technique developed by Fessy et al in 1999 to measure the centre of rotation (COR) of the hip. We then compared our study to that of a study measuring the COR of healthy native hips.

RESULTS:

127 revision THA analysed. Native COR calculated by Fessy et al showed a mean horizontal (x) axis 33.6 mm (standard deviation [SD] 5.74) and a vertical (y) axis 16.4 mm (SD 4.67). Non-TM revisions showed a mean x axis of 29 mm (SD 3.9) and y axis 17.9 (SD 5.9). TM Augments had a mean x axis 29.2 mm (SD 7.9) and y axis of 21.5 (SD 8.4). TM Cups alone had a mean x axis 27 mm (SD 6.9) and y axis 22 mm (SD 10.18).

CONCLUSIONS:

COR of TM implants showed considerable deviation from the norm. Non-TM implants showed a COR within acceptable physiological range. TM components consistently failed to restore a natural COR in our cohort. The implications of this remain uncertain but must be considered in any decision to use TM.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiografia / Artroplastia de Quadril / Prótese de Quadril / Acetábulo / Metais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Hip Int Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiografia / Artroplastia de Quadril / Prótese de Quadril / Acetábulo / Metais Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Hip Int Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article