Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Educational intervention on medication reviews aiming to reduce acute healthcare consumption in elderly patients with potentially inappropriate medicines-A pragmatic open-label cluster-randomized controlled trial in primary care.
Schmidt-Mende, K; Andersen, M; Wettermark, B; Hasselström, J.
Afiliação
  • Schmidt-Mende K; Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Stockholm County Council and Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden.
  • Andersen M; Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
  • Wettermark B; Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Hasselström J; Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf ; 26(11): 1347-1356, 2017 Nov.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28799226
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Potentially inappropriate medicines (PIMs) may cause 10% of unplanned admissions in elderly people. We performed an educational intervention in primary care to reduce acute health care consumption and PIMs through the promotion of medication reviews (MRs) in elderly patients.

METHODS:

This cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in the context of an official campaign promoting rational drug use in elderly people. Sixty-nine primary health care practices with 119,910 patients aged older than or equal to 65 were randomized, with 1 dropout in the intervention group. The intervention consisted of educational outreach visits with feedback on prescribing and the development of a working procedure on MRs. Follow-up was 9 months. Outcomes were assessed in an administrative health care database. The combined primary outcome was unplanned hospital admission and/or emergency department visit. Secondary outcomes were among other PIMs and rates of MRs. The risk differences in outcomes between intervention and control group were estimated by using regression models.

RESULTS:

During follow-up, 22.8% of patients in the intervention and 22.0% in the control group were admitted unplanned to hospital and/or experienced at least 1 emergency department (nonsignificant risk difference 0.8%, 95% CI -0.7% to 2.4%). There were no significant differences regarding secondary outcomes such as PIMs or MRs.

CONCLUSIONS:

No changes were seen in acute health care consumption, PIMs, and MRs in elderly patients after an educational intervention in primary care. The reasons for the lack of effect could be a suboptimal intervention, limitations in outcome measures, and the use of administrative data to monitor outcomes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais / Idoso / Educação Médica / Prescrição Inadequada Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Assunto da revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais / Idoso / Educação Médica / Prescrição Inadequada Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Assunto da revista: EPIDEMIOLOGIA / TERAPIA POR MEDICAMENTOS Ano de publicação: 2017 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Suécia