Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bladder Reconstruction Rates Differ among Centers Participating in National Spina Bifida Patient Registry.
Routh, Jonathan C; Joseph, David B; Liu, Tiebin; Schechter, Michael S; Thibadeau, Judy K; Wallis, M Chad; Ward, Elisabeth A; Wiener, John S.
Afiliação
  • Routh JC; Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Electronic address: jon.routh@duke.edu.
  • Joseph DB; Department of Urology, University of Alabama-Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
  • Liu T; National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Schechter MS; Division of Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, Children's Hospital of Richmond at Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
  • Thibadeau JK; National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Wallis MC; Division of Urology, Primary Children's Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah.
  • Ward EA; National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia; Carter Consulting, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia.
  • Wiener JS; Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
J Urol ; 199(1): 268-273, 2018 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28830753
PURPOSE: We performed an exploratory analysis of data from the NSBPR (National Spina Bifida Patient Registry) to assess variation in the frequency of bladder reconstruction surgeries among NSBPR centers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried the 2009-2014 NSBPR to identify patients who had ever undergone bladder reconstruction surgeries. We evaluated demographic characteristics, spina bifida type, functional level, mobility and NSBPR center to determine whether any of these factors were associated with reconstructive surgery rates. Multivariable logistic regression was used to simultaneously adjust for the impact of these factors. RESULTS: We identified 5,528 patients with spina bifida enrolled in the NSBPR. Of these patients 1,129 (20.4%) underwent bladder reconstruction (703 augmentation, 382 continent catheterizable channel, 189 bladder outlet procedure). Surgical patients were more likely older, female, nonHispanic white, with a higher lesion level, myelomeningocele diagnosis, nonambulators (all p <0.001) and nonprivately insured (p=0.018). Bladder reconstruction surgery rates varied among NSBPR centers (range 12.1% to 37.9%, p <0.001). After correcting for known confounders NSBPR center, spina bifida type, mobility, gender and age (all p <0.001) were significant predictors of surgical intervention. Race (p=0.19) and insurance status (p=0.11) were not associated with surgical intervention. CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in rates of bladder reconstruction surgery among NSBPR centers. In addition to clinical factors such as mobility status, lesion type and lesion level, nonclinical factors such as patient age, gender and treating center are also associated with the likelihood of an individual undergoing bladder reconstruction.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos / Sistema de Registros / Disrafismo Espinal / Meningomielocele / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Hospitais Especializados Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos / Sistema de Registros / Disrafismo Espinal / Meningomielocele / Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica / Hospitais Especializados Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Infant / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Urol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article