Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prevalence analysis of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy and influential preoperative factors in a single institution.
Tienza, Antonio; Robles, Jose E; Hevia, Mateo; Algarra, Ruben; Diez-Caballero, Fernando; Pascual, Juan I.
Afiliação
  • Tienza A; a Department of Urology , Clinica Universidad de Navarra , Pamplona , Spain.
  • Robles JE; a Department of Urology , Clinica Universidad de Navarra , Pamplona , Spain.
  • Hevia M; a Department of Urology , Clinica Universidad de Navarra , Pamplona , Spain.
  • Algarra R; a Department of Urology , Clinica Universidad de Navarra , Pamplona , Spain.
  • Diez-Caballero F; a Department of Urology , Clinica Universidad de Navarra , Pamplona , Spain.
  • Pascual JI; a Department of Urology , Clinica Universidad de Navarra , Pamplona , Spain.
Aging Male ; 21(1): 24-30, 2018 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28857655
ABSTRACT

AIMS:

To assess prevalence of urinary incontinence (UI) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to analyze which preoperative characteristics of the patients have influence on UI.

METHODS:

Between 2002 and 2012, 746 consecutive patients underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer. We defined UI according to International Continence Society (ICS) definition "the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine" after 12 months of recovery, international consultation on incontinence questionnaire (ICIQ-SF) and pads/day was collected too. Clinical features and magnetic resonance imaging measurements were assessed. A multivariable logistic regression model predicting incontinence were built-in after adjust by cofounding factors and bootstrapping.

RESULTS:

About 172 (23%) of the patients were classified as incontinent according to the ICS definition. The mean value of the ICIQ-SF was 10.87 (±4). 17.8% of patients use at least one pad/day, 11.9% use more than one pad/day. The preoperative factors independently influential in UI are age [OR 1.055; CI 95% (1.006-1.107), p = .028], urethral wall thickness [OR 5.03; CI 95% (1.11-22.8), p = .036], history of transurethral resection of the prostate [OR 6.13; CI 95% (1.86-20.18), p = .003] and membranous urethral length [OR 0.173; CI 95% (0.046-0.64), p = .009]. The predictive accuracy of the model is 78.7% and the area under the curve (AUC) value 71.7%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy has different prevalence depending on the definition. Age, prior transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), membranous urethral length (MUL) and urethral wall thickness (UWT) were risk factors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Prostatectomia / Neoplasias da Próstata / Incontinência Urinária Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Aging Male Assunto da revista: GERIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Complicações Pós-Operatórias / Prostatectomia / Neoplasias da Próstata / Incontinência Urinária Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Aging Male Assunto da revista: GERIATRIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Espanha