Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma by topical photodynamic therapy with fractionated 5-aminolaevulinic acid 20% vs. two-stage topical methyl aminolaevulinate: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Kessels, J P H M; Kreukels, H; Nelemans, P J; Roozeboom, M H; van Pelt, H; Mosterd, K; de Haas, E R M; Kelleners-Smeets, N W J.
Afiliação
  • Kessels JPHM; Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • Kreukels H; Department of Dermatology, Zuyderland Medical Centre, Heerlen, the Netherlands.
  • Nelemans PJ; GROW School for Developmental Biology and Oncology.
  • Roozeboom MH; Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • van Pelt H; Department of Dermatology, Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Mosterd K; Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
  • de Haas ERM; Department of Dermatology, VieCuri Medical Centre, Venlo/Venray, the Netherlands.
  • Kelleners-Smeets NWJ; Department of Dermatology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Br J Dermatol ; 178(5): 1056-1063, 2018 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28886209
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of skin cancer and incidence rates are increasing. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a frequently used treatment, especially for superficial BCC (sBCC). Two topical photosensitizing agents are currently used to treat sBCC, namely 5-aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) and its ester, methyl aminolaevulinate (MAL). Previous research showed a high efficacy for ALA-PDT using a twofold fractionated illumination scheme in which two light fractions of 20 J cm-2 and 80 J cm-2 were delivered 4 h and 6 h after ALA application.

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate whether twofold ALA-PDT is superior to conventional MAL-PDT for sBCC.

METHODS:

We performed a single-blind, randomized, multicentre trial in the Netherlands.

RESULTS:

Overall, 162 patients were randomized either to conventional MAL-PDT or twofold ALA-PDT. After 12 months, a total of six treatment failures occurred following ALA-PDT and 13 treatment failures occurred following MAL-PDT. The 12-month cumulative probability of remaining free from treatment failure was 92·3% [95% confidence interval (CI) (83·7-96·5)] for ALA-PDT and 83·4% (95% CI 73·1-90·0) for MAL-PDT (P = 0·091).

CONCLUSIONS:

The twofold ALA-PDT scheme resulted in fewer recurrences, although the difference between both treatment groups was not statistically significant. However, ALA-PDT resulted in higher pain scores and more post-treatment side-effects compared with MAL-PDT.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fotoquimioterapia / Neoplasias Cutâneas / Carcinoma Basocelular / Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Dermatol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fotoquimioterapia / Neoplasias Cutâneas / Carcinoma Basocelular / Fármacos Fotossensibilizantes Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Br J Dermatol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Holanda