Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Betel Quid Use and Oral Cancer in a High-Risk Refugee Community in the USA: The Effectiveness of an Awareness Initiative.
Shi, Lucy L; Bradford, Ella; Depalo, Danielle E; Chen, Amy Y.
Afiliação
  • Shi LL; Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Bradford E; The Westminster Schools, Atlanta, GA, USA.
  • Depalo DE; Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
  • Chen AY; Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, 550 Peachtree St NE, Ste 1135, Atlanta, GA, 30308, USA.
J Cancer Educ ; 34(2): 309-314, 2019 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29164494
Betel nut (BN) is a psychoactive oral carcinogen that is commonly used among Asian communities. This study aims to investigate BN usage patterns and the effectiveness of a visually guided educational initiative in a high-risk refugee population. All adult patients presenting to a private practice clinic, free community clinic, or health fair in the refugee community of Clarkston, Georgia during days when survey staff were present were approached for the study. Participants were first categorized into a familiar and unfamiliar cohort depending on participant-reported familiarity with BN. Depending on familiarity, subjects were then administered a pre-intervention test surveying health awareness for BN and usage patterns where relevant; subsequently, a visually guided educational brochure was reviewed, and a post-intervention test was administered. Results were statistically analyzed (STATA 12). Forty-eight participants were surveyed for the familiar cohort and 25 for the unfamiliar cohort. Among the familiar cohort, South and Southeast Asians comprised 91% of participants. On frequency of use, 42.8% reported social, 28.6% reported usage during celebrations only, and 28.6% reported daily. The most common reasons for use were for taste (40.9%), enjoyment (38.6%), and addiction (25%). Among the familiar cohort, 75% believed BN was harmful for health compared to 8% among the unfamiliar (p < 0.0001). In the familiar cohort, 52.3% believed BN alone could cause cancer compared to 4% among the unfamiliar (p < 0.0001). Following the educational intervention, 100% of participants believed BN mastication is harmful in both cohorts (p < 0.01), while 87.5% of participants in both cohorts recognized that BN alone could cause cancer (p < 0.0007). This study illustrates gaps in understanding regarding oral cancer and the health consequences of chronic BN mastication, as well as the efficacy of a visually guided educational brochure to improve participant knowledge among a high-risk refugee population.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Areca / Refugiados / Neoplasias Bucais / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Educação em Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Areca / Refugiados / Neoplasias Bucais / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Educação em Saúde Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: America do norte / Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Cancer Educ Assunto da revista: EDUCACAO / NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos