Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Patient-Identified Barriers and Facilitators to Pre-Visit Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures Completion in Patients With Hip and Knee Pain.
Liu, Tiffany C; Ohueri, Chelsi W; Schryver, Eric M; Bozic, Kevin J; Koenig, Karl M.
Afiliação
  • Liu TC; Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
  • Ohueri CW; Department of Population Health, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
  • Schryver EM; University of Texas Medical Branch School of Medicine, Galveston, Texas.
  • Bozic KJ; Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
  • Koenig KM; Department of Surgery and Perioperative Care, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
J Arthroplasty ; 33(3): 643-649.e1, 2018 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29169689
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Although patient-reported outcomes measures (PROMs) provide valuable health information and aid medical decision making for patients with hip and knee arthritis, survey completion rates remain low. The purpose of this study is to elucidate patient preferences regarding location of completion, delivery method, and barriers or facilitators to pre-visit completion.

METHODS:

Patients with hip and/or knee pain who were asked to complete pre-visit PROMs at 2 urban arthroplasty clinics were recruited. In-person, semi-structured, audio-recorded interviews were conducted, transcribed, and coded for thematic analysis. Codes were developed using a data-driven approach.

RESULTS:

We analyzed 51 interviews. The mean age was 57 years, 57% were women, and 45% had private or Medicare insurance. Prevalent themes regarding location preferences were convenience and communication preferences. Thirty-four patients stated a preference for completing pre-visit PROMs at home, 19 for in-office completion, and 10 stated no preference. Prevalent themes around delivery methods included technology access and familiarity. Of the 43 patients asked to select their preferred pre-visit PROM delivery method (phone call, email, text message, or postal mail), 31 (72%) preferred email or text messaging. Barriers to completing pre-visit PROMs were technological issues, recognizing the message was healthcare-related, and being too busy or forgetting. Twenty patients identified no barriers.

CONCLUSION:

Electronic PROM collection is favored by many patients, but alternative methods for patients without access to or familiarity with technology remain important. Clear recognition that the message is from a physician's office and physician communication of the utility of PROMs in clinical decision making may increase pre-visit completion.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor / Participação do Paciente / Coleta de Dados / Tomada de Decisões / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Dor / Participação do Paciente / Coleta de Dados / Tomada de Decisões / Medidas de Resultados Relatados pelo Paciente Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: J Arthroplasty Assunto da revista: ORTOPEDIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article