Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current and Future United States Light-Duty Vehicle Pathways: Cradle-to-Grave Lifecycle Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Assessment.
Elgowainy, Amgad; Han, Jeongwoo; Ward, Jacob; Joseck, Fred; Gohlke, David; Lindauer, Alicia; Ramsden, Todd; Biddy, Mary; Alexander, Mark; Barnhart, Steven; Sutherland, Ian; Verduzco, Laura; Wallington, Timothy J.
Afiliação
  • Elgowainy A; Argonne National Laboratory , Argonne, Illinois 60439, United States.
  • Han J; Argonne National Laboratory , Argonne, Illinois 60439, United States.
  • Ward J; United States Department of Energy , Washington, D.C. 20585, United States.
  • Joseck F; United States Department of Energy , Washington, D.C. 20585, United States.
  • Gohlke D; Argonne National Laboratory , Argonne, Illinois 60439, United States.
  • Lindauer A; United States Department of Energy , Washington, D.C. 20585, United States.
  • Ramsden T; National Renewable Energy Laboratory , Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.
  • Biddy M; National Renewable Energy Laboratory , Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.
  • Alexander M; Electric Power Research Institute , Palo Alto, California 94304, United States.
  • Barnhart S; FCA US LLC , Auburn Hills, Michigan 48326, United States.
  • Sutherland I; General Motors , Pontiac, Michigan 48340, United States.
  • Verduzco L; Chevron Corporation , Richmond, California 94802, United States.
  • Wallington TJ; Ford Motor Company , Dearborn, Michigan 48121, United States.
Environ Sci Technol ; 52(4): 2392-2399, 2018 02 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29298387
This article presents a cradle-to-grave (C2G) assessment of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and costs for current (2015) and future (2025-2030) light-duty vehicles. The analysis addressed both fuel cycle and vehicle manufacturing cycle for the following vehicle types: gasoline and diesel internal combustion engine vehicles (ICEVs), flex fuel vehicles, compressed natural gas (CNG) vehicles, hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs), hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs), battery electric vehicles (BEVs), and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). Gasoline ICEVs using current technology have C2G emissions of ∼450 gCO2e/mi (grams of carbon dioxide equivalents per mile), while C2G emissions from HEVs, PHEVs, H2 FCEVs, and BEVs range from 300-350 gCO2e/mi. Future vehicle efficiency gains are expected to reduce emissions to ∼350 gCO2/mi for ICEVs and ∼250 gCO2e/mi for HEVs, PHEVs, FCEVs, and BEVs. Utilizing low-carbon fuel pathways yields GHG reductions more than double those achieved by vehicle efficiency gains alone. Levelized costs of driving (LCDs) are in the range $0.25-$1.00/mi depending on time frame and vehicle-fuel technology. In all cases, vehicle cost represents the major (60-90%) contribution to LCDs. Currently, HEV and PHEV petroleum-fueled vehicles provide the most attractive cost in terms of avoided carbon emissions, although they offer lower potential GHG reductions. The ranges of LCD and cost of avoided carbon are narrower for the future technology pathways, reflecting the expected economic competitiveness of these alternative vehicles and fuels.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gases de Efeito Estufa Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Environ Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gases de Efeito Estufa Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Environ Sci Technol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos