Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Facilitating adherence to endocrine therapy in breast cancer: stability and predictive power of treatment expectations in a 2-year prospective study.
Pan, Yiqi; Heisig, Sarah R; von Blanckenburg, Pia; Albert, Ute-Susann; Hadji, Peyman; Rief, Winfried; Nestoriuc, Yvonne.
Afiliação
  • Pan Y; Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistraße 52, 20251, Hamburg, Germany. y.pan@uke.de.
  • Heisig SR; Schön Klinik Hamburg Eilbek, University Clinic for Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, Dehnhaide 120, 20081, Hamburg, Germany. y.pan@uke.de.
  • von Blanckenburg P; Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, University of Hamburg, Von-Melle-Park 5, 20146, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Albert US; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
  • Hadji P; AWMF-Institute for Medical Knowledge Management, Philipps-University of Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str. 1, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
  • Rief W; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Steinbacher Hohl 2-26, 60488, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
  • Nestoriuc Y; Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Philipps-University of Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.
Breast Cancer Res Treat ; 168(3): 667-677, 2018 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29330625
PURPOSE: To identify modifiable factors predictive of long-term adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET). METHODS: As part of a 2-year cohort study in primary care (n = 116), we investigated whether initial treatment expectations predict adherence at 24 months after controlling for demographic, medical, and psychosocial variables. Treatment expectations were measured as necessity-concern beliefs, expected side-effect severity, and expected coping with side effects. Their stability over time and differences of trajectories between the adherent and nonadherent group were examined. RESULTS: Nonadherence at 24 months was 14.7% (n = 17). Side-effect severity at 3 months [OR 0.25, 95% CI (0.08, 0.81), p = 0.02] and necessity-concern beliefs [OR 2.03, 95% CI (1.11, 3.72), p = 0.02] were the sole predictors of adherence. Necessity-concern beliefs remained stable over 2 years, whereas expected side-effect severity (p = 0.01, η p2  = 0.07) and expected coping with side effects became less optimistic over time (p < 0.001, η p2  = 0.19), the latter particularly among nonadherers (p < 0.01, η p2  = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Patients' initial necessity-concern beliefs about the AET and early severity of side effects affect long-term adherence. Expecting poor management of side effects may also facilitate nonadherence. We suggest that discussing benefits, addressing concerns of AET, and providing side-effect coping strategies could constitute a feasible and promising option to improve adherence in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Adesão à Medicação Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Breast Cancer Res Treat Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Adesão à Medicação Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Breast Cancer Res Treat Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha