Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Barriers to cervical cancer screening exist despite integrating HIV and gynaecological services for HIV-positive women in Poland.
Kowalska, Justyna Dominika; Wroblewska, Agnieszka; Zabek, Piotr; Firlag-Burkacka, Ewa; Kalinowska, Monika; Byczot, Zofia; Horban, Andrzej.
Afiliação
  • Kowalska JD; HIV Out-Patient Clinic, Hospital for Infectious Diseases in Warsaw, Poland; Department of Adults' Infectious Diseases, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland, Wolska 37, 01-201 Warsaw, Poland. jdkowalska@gmail.com.
Ginekol Pol ; 89(2): 68-73, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29512810
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

HIV-positive women are at increased risk of HPV infection and cervical cancer. European and national guidelines advise yearly screening for cervical cancer, however due to the lack of a central registration of HIV infected persons there is a gap in offering such care through general healthcare services in many countries, including Poland. MATERIAL AND

METHODS:

In response to the above limitations, integrated gynaecological care (IGC) was established at the HIV Out-Patient Clinic in Warsaw. We analysed data from January 2007 to May 2014. Logistic regression models were used to identify factors associated with not using IGC by patients.

RESULTS:

Two hundred and forty women were registered in the observation period59.6% infected through sexual contact, 18.7% through IDUs, 19.2 % through unknown causes and 2.5% by other (two were vertically infected). The median follow-up time was 2.35 (IQR 0.9-4.5) years and 78.3% were on combination antiretroviral therapy (cART). In total 145 of the women (60.4%) used IGC, from 72.1% of those registered in 2007 to 27.3% registered in 2014. There were in total 1075 gynaeco-logical visits and 254 cervical cytology tests performed. Seventy-five (51.7%) women were tested for HPV infection. Fac-tors decreasing the odds of not using IGC identified by multivariate regression models were being on cART (OR 0.25 [IQR 0.10-0.59]; p = 0.003) and longer time of observation (0.69 [0.58-0.83]; p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

The utilisation of IGC was very high, but with a delay in commencing the IGC. Women on cART and with longer periods of follow-up had lower odds of not using IGC. A screening approach for women not yet on cART, or newly registered in the clinics, needs special attention.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Soropositividade para HIV / Atenção à Saúde / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ginekol Pol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Polônia

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde / Neoplasias do Colo do Útero / Soropositividade para HIV / Atenção à Saúde / Detecção Precoce de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Screening_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans País/Região como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: Ginekol Pol Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Polônia