Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Application of newly developed Fluoro-QC software for image quality evaluation in cardiac X-ray systems.
Oliveira, M; Lopez, G; Geambastiani, P; Ubeda, C.
Afiliação
  • Oliveira M; Department of Heath Technology and Biology, Federal Institute of Bahia, Emídio dos Santos e s/n, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Electronic address: marcusradiology@gmail.com.
  • Lopez G; Department of Heath Technology and Biology, Federal Institute of Bahia, Emídio dos Santos e s/n, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Electronic address: guillermealbertolopez@yahoo.com.br.
  • Geambastiani P; Cardio Pulmonar Hospital, Av. Anita Garibaldi, 2199 - Garibaldi, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Electronic address: paulogeambastiani@hotmail.com.
  • Ubeda C; Medical Technology Department, Health Sciences Faculty, Tarapaca University, Av. 18 de septiembre, n° 2222, Arica, Chile. Electronic address: cubeda@uta.cl.
Radiography (Lond) ; 24(2): e44-e47, 2018 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29605124
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

A quality assurance (QA) program is a valuable tool for the continuous production of optimal quality images. The aim of this paper is to assess a newly developed automatic computer software for image quality (IR) evaluation in fluoroscopy X-ray systems.

METHODS:

Test object images were acquired using one fluoroscopy system, Siemens Axiom Artis model (Siemens AG, Medical Solutions Erlangen, Germany). The software was developed as an ImageJ plugin. Two image quality parameters were assessed high-contrast spatial resolution (HCSR) and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). The time between manual and automatic image quality assessment procedures were compared. The paired t-test was used to assess the data. p Values of less than 0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS:

The Fluoro-QC software generated faster IQ evaluation results (mean = 0.31 ± 0.08 min) than manual procedure (mean = 4.68 ± 0.09 min). The mean difference between techniques was 4.36 min. Discrepancies were identified in the region of interest (ROI) areas drawn manually with evidence of user dependence. The new software presented the results of two tests (HCSR = 3.06, SNR = 5.17) and also collected information from the DICOM header. Significant differences were not identified between manual and automatic measures of SNR (p value = 0.22) and HCRS (p value = 0.46).

CONCLUSION:

The Fluoro-QC software is a feasible, fast and free to use method for evaluating imaging quality parameters on fluoroscopy systems.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde / Software / Fluoroscopia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Radiography (Lond) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde / Software / Fluoroscopia Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Radiography (Lond) Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article