Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: role, controversy, and future directions.
Haddad, R I; Posner, M; Hitt, R; Cohen, E E W; Schulten, J; Lefebvre, J-L; Vermorken, J B.
Afiliação
  • Haddad RI; Head and Neck Oncology Program, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston.
  • Posner M; The Tisch Cancer Institute, Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York City, USA.
  • Hitt R; Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Severo Ochoa, Madrid, Spain.
  • Cohen EEW; Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, USA.
  • Schulten J; Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
  • Lefebvre JL; Head and Neck Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France.
  • Vermorken JB; Department of Medical Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium. Electronic address: janb.vermorken@uza.be.
Ann Oncol ; 29(5): 1130-1140, 2018 05 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29635316
Background: The value of induction chemotherapy (ICT) remains under investigation despite decades of research. New advancements in the field, specifically regarding the induction regimen of choice, have reignited interest in this approach for patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA SCCHN). Sufficient evidence has accumulated regarding the benefits and superiority of TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil) over the chemotherapy doublet cisplatin and fluorouracil. We therefore sought to collate and interpret the available data and further discuss the considerations for delivering ICT safely and optimally selecting suitable post-ICT regimens. Design: We nonsystematically reviewed published phase III clinical trials on TPF ICT in a variety of LA SCCHN patient populations conducted between 1990 and 2017. Results: TPF may confer survival and organ preservation benefits in a subgroup of patients with functionally inoperable or poor-prognosis LA SCCHN. Additionally, patients with operable disease or good prognosis (who are not candidates for organ preservation) may benefit from TPF induction in terms of reducing local and distant failure rates and facilitating treatment deintensification in selected populations. The safe administration of TPF requires treatment by a multidisciplinary team at an experienced institution. The management of adverse events associated with TPF and post-ICT radiotherapy-based treatment is crucial. Finally, post-ICT chemotherapy alternatives to cisplatin concurrent with radiotherapy (i.e. cetuximab or carboplatin plus radiotherapy) appear promising and must be investigated further. Conclusions: TPF is an evidence-based ICT regimen of choice in LA SCCHN and confers benefits in suitable patients when it is administered safely by an experienced multidisciplinary team and paired with the optimal post-ICT regimen, for which, however, no consensus currently exists.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Quimioterapia de Indução / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Quimioterapia de Indução / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço / Neoplasias de Cabeça e Pescoço Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article