Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dosimetric effect of limited aperture multileaf collimator on VMAT plan quality: A study of prostate and head-and-neck cancers.
Murtaza, Ghulam; Mehmood, Shahid; Rasul, Shahid; Murtaza, Imran; Khan, Ehsan Ullah.
Afiliação
  • Murtaza G; School of Health Sciences, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.
  • Mehmood S; Medical Physics, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
  • Rasul S; Oncology Department, Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
  • Murtaza I; Physics Department, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
  • Khan EU; Physics Department, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother ; 23(3): 189-198, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29760593
ABSTRACT

AIM:

The aim of study was to evaluate the dosimetric effect of collimator-rotation on VMAT plan quality, when using limited aperture multileaf collimator of Elekta Beam Modulator™ providing a maximum aperture of 21 cm × 16 cm.

BACKGROUND:

The increased use of VMAT technique to deliver IMRT from conventional to very specialized treatments present a challenge in plan optimization. In this study VMAT plans were optimized for prostate and head and neck cancers using Elekta Beam-ModulatorTM, whereas previous studies were reported for conventional Linac aperture. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

VMAT plans for nine of each prostate and head-and-neck cancer patients were produced using the 6 MV photon beam for Elekta-SynergyS® Linac using Pinnacle3 treatment planning system. Single arc, dual arc and two combined independent-single arcs were optimized for collimator angles (C) 0°, 90° and 0°-90° (0°-90°; i.e. the first-arc was assigned C0° and second-arc was assigned C90°). A treatment plan comparison was performed among C0°, C90° and C(0°-90°) for single-arc dual-arc and two independent-single-arcs VMAT techniques to evaluate the influence of extreme collimator rotations (C0° and 90°) on VMAT plan quality. Plan evaluation criteria included the target coverage, conformity index, homogeneity index and doses to organs at risk. A 'two-sided student t-test' (p ≤ 0.05) was used to determine if there was a significant difference in dose volume indices of plans.

RESULTS:

For both prostate and head-and-neck, plan quality at collimator angles C0° and C(0°-90°) was clinically acceptable for all VMAT-techniques, except SA for head-and-neck. Poorer target coverage, higher normal tissue doses and significant p-values were observed for collimator angle 90° when compared with C0° and C(0°-90°).

CONCLUSIONS:

A collimator rotation of 0° provided significantly better target coverage and sparing of organs-at-risk than a collimator rotation of 90° for all VMAT techniques.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Paquistão

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Revista: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Paquistão