Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Increasing soft tissue thickness does not affect trabecular bone score reproducibility: a phantom study.
Messina, Carmelo; Poloni, Alessandro; Chianca, Vito; Albano, Domenico; Piodi, Luca Petruccio; Ulivieri, Fabio Massimo; Sconfienza, Luca Maria.
Afiliação
  • Messina C; Unità Operativa di Radiologia Diagnostica ed Interventistica, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy. carmelomessina.md@gmail.com.
  • Poloni A; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy. carmelomessina.md@gmail.com.
  • Chianca V; Reparto di Radiologia, ASST Bergamo Est Ospedale Bolognini, Via Paderno 21, 24068, Seriate, Italy.
  • Albano D; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche Avanzate, Università Federico II, Via Panzini 5, Napoli, Italy.
  • Piodi LP; Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Di.Bi.Med., Università degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, 90127, Palermo, Italy.
  • Ulivieri FM; Gastroenterology and Digestive Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
  • Sconfienza LM; Bone Metabolic Unit, Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Endocrine ; 61(2): 336-342, 2018 08.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29948934
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Trabecular Bone Score (TBS) provides an indirect score of trabecular microarchitecture from lumbar spine (LS) dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Increasing soft tissue thickness artifactually reduces TBS values; we evaluated the effect of a fictitious increase of soft tissue thickness on TBS and bone mineral density (BMD) reproducibility on a phantom model.

METHODS:

A Hologic spine phantom was scanned with a QDR-Discovery W Hologic densitometer. Fresh pork rind layers of 5 mm were used to simulate the in-vivo soft tissues. For each scan mode (fast array [FA], array, high definition [HD]), 25 scans were consecutively performed without phantom repositioning, at 0 (no layers), 1 cm, 3 cm, and 6 cm of thickness. BMD and TBS reproducibility was calculated as the complement to 100% of least significant change.

RESULTS:

Both BMD and TBS reproducibility slightly decreased with increasing soft tissue; this difference was statistically significant only for BMD using HD modality (reproducibility decreased from 99.4% at baseline to 98.4% at 6-cm of thickness). TBS reproducibility was slightly lower compared to that of BMD, and ranged between 98.8% (array, 0 cm) and 97.4% (FA, 6 cm). Without taking into account manufacturer BMI optimization, we found a progressive decrease of TBS mean values with increasing soft tissue thickness. The highest TBS difference between baseline scan and 6 cm was -0.179 (-14.27%) using HD.

CONCLUSIONS:

Despite being slightly lower than that of BMD, TBS reproducibility was not affected up to 6 cm of increasing soft tissue thickness, and was even less influenced by fat than BMD reproducibility.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Absorciometria de Fóton / Tecido Adiposo / Tecido Conjuntivo / Imagens de Fantasmas / Osso Esponjoso / Músculos Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Endocrine Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Absorciometria de Fóton / Tecido Adiposo / Tecido Conjuntivo / Imagens de Fantasmas / Osso Esponjoso / Músculos Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Revista: Endocrine Assunto da revista: ENDOCRINOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália