Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Post-lumbar discectomy reoperations that are associated with poor clinical and socioeconomic outcomes can be reduced through use of a novel annular closure device: results from a 2-year randomized controlled trial.
Klassen, Peter Douglas; Hsu, Wellington K; Martens, Frederic; Inzana, Jason A; van den Brink, Wimar A; Groff, Michael W; Thomé, Claudius.
Afiliação
  • Klassen PD; Department of Neurosurgery, St. Bonifatius Hospital, Lingen, Germany.
  • Hsu WK; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
  • Martens F; Department of Neurosurgery, OLV Ziekenhuis, Aalst, Belgium.
  • Inzana JA; Telos Partners LLC, Denver, CO, USA, jinzana@telospartnersllc.com.
  • van den Brink WA; Neurochirurgisch Centrum Zwolle, Zwolle, the Netherlands.
  • Groff MW; Neurosurgical Spine Service, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Thomé C; Department of Neurosurgery, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res ; 10: 349-357, 2018.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29983583
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Lumbar discectomy patients with large annular defects are at a high risk for reherniation and reoperation, which could be mitigated through the use of an annular closure device (ACD). To identify the most effective treatment pathways for this high-risk population, it is critical to understand the clinical outcomes and socioeconomic costs among reoperated patients as well as the utility of ACD for minimizing reoperation risk.

METHODS:

This was a post hoc analysis of a prospective, multicenter, randomized controlled trial (RCT) designed to investigate the safety and efficacy of an ACD. All 550 patients (both ACD treated and control) from the RCT with follow-up data through 2 years were included in this analysis (69 reoperated and 481 non-reoperated). Reoperations were defined as any revision surgery of the index level, regardless of indication. Equivalent U.S. Medicare expenditures for reoperations were estimated through cost multipliers derived from the commercially available PearlDiver database.

RESULTS:

A significantly greater number of control patients (45/278; 16%) compared to ACD patients (24/272; 9%) underwent a revision surgery at the index level within 2 years of followup (p=0.01). At 2 years of follow-up, the reoperated patients had significantly worse Oswestry Disability Index scores and visual analog scale for leg and back pain scores compared to their non-reoperated counterparts (p<0.0001). The total estimated direct medical costs for reoperation were US $952,348 ($13,802 per reoperated patient), with control patients accounting for the majority of this cost burden ($565,188; 59%).

CONCLUSION:

Post-discectomy reoperation is associated with significantly increased patient morbidity, missed work, and direct treatment costs in a population at high risk for reherniation. Annular closure helped minimize this clinical and socioeconomic burden by reducing the incidence of reoperation by nearly 50% (16% control vs 9% ACD).
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha