Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Indistinguishable T2/T3-N0 rectal cancer on rectal magnetic resonance imaging: comparison of surgery-first and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy-first strategies.
Kim, Jun Gon; Song, Kyoung Doo; Cha, Dong Ik; Kim, Hee Cheol; Yu, Jeong Il.
Afiliação
  • Kim JG; Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
  • Song KD; Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea. kd3893.song@samsung.com.
  • Cha DI; Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim HC; Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
  • Yu JI; Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
Int J Colorectal Dis ; 33(10): 1359-1366, 2018 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30003363
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

We compared the treatment outcome between surgery-first and neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT)-first strategies in patients with indistinguishable T2/T3-N0 rectal cancer on rectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

METHODS:

Our institutional review board approved this retrospective study, and informed consent was waived. Among 1910 patients who underwent rectal MRI between 2008 and 2012, 79 patients (mean age, 59.4 years, 49 men and 30 women) who had indistinguishable T2/T3-N0 rectal cancer on rectal MRI were included. Local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) were compared between the two groups. Treatment-related complications were evaluated.

RESULTS:

Among 79 patients, 51 were treated by surgery first and 28 were treated by nCRT first. In comparison of survival of the surgery- and nCRT-first groups at 5 years, the LRFS rate was 95.6 and 96.3%, RFS rate was 91.0 and 92.4%, OS rate was 93.7 and 92.6%, and DSS rate was 98.0 and 92.6%, respectively. LRFS, RFS, OS, and DSS showed no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.862, 0.677, 0.953, and 0.479). The complication rate was not significantly different between the groups (20.0% for surgery-first group vs. 10.7% for nCRT-first group, p = 0.357).

CONCLUSION:

Treatment outcomes were not significantly different between surgery-first and nCRT-first strategies for indistinguishable T2/T3-N0 rectal cancer on rectal MRI.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Colectomia / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Retais / Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética / Colectomia / Terapia Neoadjuvante / Quimiorradioterapia Adjuvante Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Int J Colorectal Dis Assunto da revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article