Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Tourniquet Use in Wide-Awake Carpal Tunnel Release.
Sasor, Sarah E; Cook, Julia A; Duquette, Stephen P; Lucich, Elizabeth A; Cohen, Adam C; Wooden, William A; Tholpady, Sunil S; Chu, Michael W.
Afiliação
  • Sasor SE; Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.
  • Cook JA; Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.
  • Duquette SP; Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.
  • Lucich EA; Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.
  • Cohen AC; Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Wooden WA; Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.
  • Tholpady SS; Richard L. Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
  • Chu MW; Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA.
Hand (N Y) ; 15(1): 59-63, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30003819
ABSTRACT

Background:

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a common cause of upper extremity discomfort. Surgical release of the median nerve can be performed under general or local anesthetic, with or without a tourniquet. Wide-awake carpal tunnel release (CTR) (local anesthesia, no sedation) is gaining popularity. Tourniquet discomfort is a reported downside. This study reviews outcomes in wide-awake CTR and compares tourniquet versus no tourniquet use.

Methods:

Wide-awake, open CTRs performed from February 2013 to April 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts with and without tourniquet. Demographics, comorbidities, tobacco use, operative time, estimated blood loss, complications and outcomes were compared.

Results:

A total of 304 CTRs were performed on 246 patients. The majority of patients were male (88.5%), and the mean age was 59.9 years. One hundred patients (32.9%) were diabetic, and 92 patients (30.2%) were taking antithrombotics. Seventy-five patients (24.7%) were smokers. A forearm tourniquet was used for 90 CTRs (29.6%). Mean operative time was 24.97 minutes with a tourniquet and 21.69 minutes without. Estimated blood loss was 3.16 mL with a tourniquet and 4.25 mL without. All other analyzed outcomes were not statistically significant.

Conclusion:

Operative time was statistically longer and estimated blood loss was statistically less with tourniquet use, but these findings are not clinically significant. This suggests that local anesthetic with epinephrine is a safe and effective alternative to tourniquet use in CTR. The overall rate of complications was low, and there were no major differences in postoperative outcomes between groups.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Torniquetes / Síndrome do Túnel Carpal / Descompressão Cirúrgica / Anestesia Local / Nervo Mediano Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Hand (N Y) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Torniquetes / Síndrome do Túnel Carpal / Descompressão Cirúrgica / Anestesia Local / Nervo Mediano Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Hand (N Y) Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos