Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The low specificity of low voltage bridges associating atrioventricular nodal reentry in pediatric patients.
Marshall, Amanda M; Erickson, Christopher C; Danford, David A; Kugler, John D; Thomas, Vincent C.
Afiliação
  • Marshall AM; Division of Critical Care, Arkansas Children's Hospital, 1 Children's Way, Little Rock, AR, USA.
  • Erickson CC; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center/Children's Hospital & Medical Center, 8200 Dodge Street, 4th Floor SPC: Cardiology, Omaha, NE, 68114, USA.
  • Danford DA; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center/Children's Hospital & Medical Center, 8200 Dodge Street, 4th Floor SPC: Cardiology, Omaha, NE, 68114, USA.
  • Kugler JD; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center/Children's Hospital & Medical Center, 8200 Dodge Street, 4th Floor SPC: Cardiology, Omaha, NE, 68114, USA.
  • Thomas VC; Division of Pediatric Cardiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center/Children's Hospital & Medical Center, 8200 Dodge Street, 4th Floor SPC: Cardiology, Omaha, NE, 68114, USA. vthomas@childrensomaha.org.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 54(3): 277-281, 2019 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30032471
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Patients with atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) often are managed successfully by ablation of the slow pathway with success rates reported as high as 99%. Low voltage bridges (LVBs) have been demonstrated to be helpful in guiding AVNRT ablation. Patients may present to the electrophysiology lab without evidence of inducible arrhythmia. In these scenarios, the demonstration of LVBs may be diagnostic and guide catheter ablation treatment. The purpose of our study was to prospectively investigate the specificity of LVBs as a diagnostic marker of AVNRT.

METHODS:

Patients aged < 19 years with narrow complex tachycardia prospectively underwent electrophysiology study with intention to perform catheter ablation. In each patient, the primary objective was the collection of right atrial voltage data that was then used to identify LVBs.

RESULTS:

Twenty-four patients were included after exclusion criteria were applied. Final diagnosis was 11 AVNRT and 13 non-AVNRT (nAVNRT). LVBs were identified in 11/11 AVNRT patients and 9/13 non-AVNRT patients (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS:

LVBs are not specific to patients with AVNRT and cannot solely be used for diagnosis. However, in patients with documented AVNRT, the LVB can be used to identify the location of the slow pathway.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular / Sistema de Condução Cardíaco Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Taquicardia por Reentrada no Nó Atrioventricular / Sistema de Condução Cardíaco Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Assunto da revista: CARDIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos