Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic accuracy of third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT: a prospective trial and protocol for clinical implementation.
Nestler, Tim; Nestler, Kai; Neisius, Andreas; Isbarn, Hendrik; Netsch, Christopher; Waldeck, Stephan; Schmelz, Hans U; Ruf, Christian.
Afiliação
  • Nestler T; Department of Urology, Federal Armed Services Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany. tim-nestler@web.de.
  • Nestler K; Department of Radiology, Federal Armed Services Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
  • Neisius A; Department of Urology, Barmherzige Brueder Hospital Trier, Trier, Germany.
  • Isbarn H; Martini-Clinic Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Netsch C; Department of Urology, Asklepios Hospital Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany.
  • Waldeck S; Department of Radiology, Federal Armed Services Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany.
  • Schmelz HU; Department of Urology, Federal Armed Services Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
  • Ruf C; Department of Urology, Federal Armed Services Hospital Koblenz, Rübenacher Str. 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
World J Urol ; 37(4): 735-741, 2019 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30076456
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Uric acid (UA) calculi can be referred to chemolitholysis rather than invasive treatment. Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) may be able to distinguish between UA and non-UA (NUA) calculi. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of third-generation DECT for the first time and to investigate whether combining DECT with clinical parameters can increase its predictive accuracy. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

All patients who presented to our emergency department between January 2015 and March 2017 with urinary stones were prospectively included in this observational study and underwent DECT with subsequent interventional stone removal. Stone composition was analyzed using infrared spectrometry as the gold standard. Predictive accuracy of DECT and clinical covariates was computed by assessing univariate and multivariate areas under the curve (AUCs).

RESULTS:

Of 84 patients with 144 urinary stones, 10 (11.9%) patients had UA stones according to infrared spectrometry, and the remaining stones were NUA or mixed stones. DECT had a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 98.5% for UA stones. The AUC for urine pH alone was 0.71 and 0.97 for DECT plus urine pH. No UA stones were found in patients with a urine pH above > 5.5. Mean DLP was 225.15 ± 128.60 mGy*cm and mean effective dose was 3.38 ± 1.93 mSv.

CONCLUSIONS:

DECT is a safe method for assigning patients to oral chemolitholysis. Clinical preselection of patients based on urinary pH (< 6.0) leads to a more liable use of DECT. Third-generation DECT needs significant lower radiation doses compared to previous generations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ácido Úrico / Cálculos Urinários / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ácido Úrico / Cálculos Urinários / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: World J Urol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Alemanha