Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
TP53 Outperforms Other Androgen Receptor Biomarkers to Predict Abiraterone or Enzalutamide Outcome in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.
De Laere, Bram; Oeyen, Steffi; Mayrhofer, Markus; Whitington, Tom; van Dam, Pieter-Jan; Van Oyen, Peter; Ghysel, Christophe; Ampe, Jozef; Ost, Piet; Demey, Wim; Hoekx, Lucien; Schrijvers, Dirk; Brouwers, Barbara; Lybaert, Willem; Everaert, Els G; De Maeseneer, Daan; Strijbos, Michiel; Bols, Alain; Fransis, Karen; Beije, Nick; de Kruijff, Inge E; van Dam, Valerie; Brouwer, Anja; Goossens, Dirk; Heyrman, Lien; Van den Eynden, Gert G; Rutten, Annemie; Del Favero, Jurgen; Rantalainen, Mattias; Rajan, Prabhakar; Sleijfer, Stefan; Ullén, Anders; Yachnin, Jeffrey; Grönberg, Henrik; Van Laere, Steven J; Lindberg, Johan; Dirix, Luc Y.
Afiliação
  • De Laere B; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium. bramdelaere@gmail.com.
  • Oeyen S; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Mayrhofer M; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Whitington T; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • van Dam PJ; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Van Oyen P; HistoGeneX NV, Wilrijk, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Ghysel C; Department of Urology, AZ Sint-Jan, Brugge, Belgium.
  • Ampe J; Department of Urology, AZ Sint-Jan, Brugge, Belgium.
  • Ost P; Department of Urology, AZ Sint-Jan, Brugge, Belgium.
  • Demey W; Department of Radiation Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium.
  • Hoekx L; Department of Oncology, AZ KLINA, Brasschaat, Belgium.
  • Schrijvers D; Department of Urology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Brouwers B; Department of Oncology, ZNA Middelheim, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Lybaert W; Department of Oncology, AZ Sint-Jan, Brugge, Belgium.
  • Everaert EG; Department of Oncology, AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
  • De Maeseneer D; Department of Oncology, AZ Nikolaas, Sint-Niklaas, Belgium.
  • Strijbos M; Department of Oncology, AZ Sint-Lucas, Brugge, Belgium.
  • Bols A; Department of Oncology, AZ KLINA, Brasschaat, Belgium.
  • Fransis K; Department of Oncology, AZ Sint-Jan, Brugge, Belgium.
  • Beije N; Department of Urology, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • de Kruijff IE; Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • van Dam V; Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Brouwer A; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Goossens D; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Heyrman L; Agilent Technologies, Niel, Belgium.
  • Van den Eynden GG; Agilent Technologies, Niel, Belgium.
  • Rutten A; Department of Pathology, GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Del Favero J; Department of Oncology, GZA Hospitals Sint-Augustinus, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Rantalainen M; Agilent Technologies, Niel, Belgium.
  • Rajan P; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Sleijfer S; Centre for Molecular Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
  • Ullén A; Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
  • Yachnin J; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Grönberg H; Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Van Laere SJ; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Lindberg J; Center for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
  • Dirix LY; Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Science for Life Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Clin Cancer Res ; 25(6): 1766-1773, 2019 03 15.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30209161
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To infer the prognostic value of simultaneous androgen receptor (AR) and TP53 profiling in liquid biopsies from patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) starting a new line of AR signaling inhibitors (ARSi).Experimental

Design:

Between March 2014 and April 2017, we recruited patients with mCRPC (n = 168) prior to ARSi in a cohort study encompassing 10 European centers. Blood samples were collected for comprehensive profiling of CellSearch-enriched circulating tumor cells (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). Targeted CTC RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) allowed the detection of eight AR splice variants (ARV). Low-pass whole-genome and targeted gene-body sequencing of AR and TP53 was applied to identify amplifications, loss of heterozygosity, mutations, and structural rearrangements in ctDNA. Clinical or radiologic progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and independent associations were determined using multivariable Cox regression models.

RESULTS:

Overall, no single AR perturbation remained associated with adverse prognosis after multivariable analysis. Instead, tumor burden estimates (CTC counts, ctDNA fraction, and visceral metastases) were significantly associated with PFS. TP53 inactivation harbored independent prognostic value [HR 1.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.18-3.00; P = 0.008], and outperformed ARV expression and detection of genomic AR alterations. Using Cox coefficient analysis of clinical parameters and TP53 status, we identified three prognostic groups with differing PFS estimates (median, 14.7 vs. 7.51 vs. 2.62 months; P < 0.0001), which was validated in an independent mCRPC cohort (n = 202) starting first-line ARSi (median, 14.3 vs. 6.39 vs. 2.23 months; P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS:

In an all-comer cohort, tumor burden estimates and TP53 outperform any AR perturbation to infer prognosis.See related commentary by Rebello et al., p. 1699.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores Tumorais / Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53 / Antagonistas de Receptores de Andrógenos / Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cancer Res Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Biomarcadores Tumorais / Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53 / Antagonistas de Receptores de Andrógenos / Neoplasias de Próstata Resistentes à Castração / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Clin Cancer Res Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Bélgica