Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Letrozole and palbociclib versus chemotherapy as neoadjuvant therapy of high-risk luminal breast cancer.
Cottu, P; D'Hondt, V; Dureau, S; Lerebours, F; Desmoulins, I; Heudel, P-E; Duhoux, F P; Levy, C; Mouret-Reynier, M-A; Dalenc, F; Frenel, J-S; Jouannaud, C; Venat-Bouvet, L; Nguyen, S; Ferrero, J-M; Canon, J-L; Grenier, J; Callens, C; Gentien, D; Lemonnier, J; Vincent-Salomon, A; Delaloge, S.
Afiliação
  • Cottu P; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France; Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Paris, France. Electronic address: paul.cottu@curie.fr.
  • D'Hondt V; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  • Dureau S; Department of Biometry, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France.
  • Lerebours F; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France.
  • Desmoulins I; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc, Dijon, France.
  • Heudel PE; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.
  • Duhoux FP; Department of Medical Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium.
  • Levy C; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France.
  • Mouret-Reynier MA; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
  • Dalenc F; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole Toulouse, Toulouse, France.
  • Frenel JS; Department of Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.
  • Jouannaud C; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France.
  • Venat-Bouvet L; Department of Medical Oncology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France.
  • Nguyen S; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Hospitalier de Pau, Pau, France.
  • Ferrero JM; Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France.
  • Canon JL; Department of Oncology-Hematology, Grand Hôpital de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium.
  • Grenier J; Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Sainte-Catherine, Avignon, France.
  • Callens C; Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Paris, France; Pharmacogenomics, Department of Tumor Biology, France.
  • Gentien D; Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Paris, France; Genomics Platforms, Translational Research Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
  • Lemonnier J; R&D, Unicancer, Paris, France.
  • Vincent-Salomon A; Paris Sciences et Lettres University, Paris, France; Tumour Biology Department, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
  • Delaloge S; Department of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France.
Ann Oncol ; 29(12): 2334-2340, 2018 12 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30307466
ABSTRACT

Background:

Palbociclib is a CDK4/6 inhibitor with demonstrated efficacy and safety in combination with endocrine therapy in advanced luminal breast cancer (LBC). We evaluated the respective efficacy and safety of chemotherapy and letrozole-palbociclib (LETPAL) combination as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with high-risk LBC. Patients and

methods:

NeoPAL (UCBG10/4, NCT02400567) is a randomised, parallel, non-comparative phase II study. Patients with ER-positive, HER2-negative, Prosigna®-defined luminal B, or luminal A and node-positive, stage II-III breast cancer, not candidate for breast-conserving surgery, were randomly assigned to either letrozole (2.5 mg daily) and palbociclib (125 mg daily, 3 weeks/4) during 19 weeks, or to FEC100 (5FU 500 mg/m2, epirubicin 100 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2)×3 21-day courses followed by docetaxel 100 mg/m2×3 21-day courses. Primary end point was residual cancer burden (RCB 0-I rate). Secondary end points included clinical response, proliferation-based markers, and safety.

Results:

Overall, 106 patients were randomised [median Prosigna® ROR Score 71 (22-93)]. RCB 0-I was observed in four and eight patients in LETPAL [7.7% (95% CI 0.4-14.9)] and chemotherapy [15.7% (95% CI 5.7-25.7)] arms, respectively. Pathological complete response rates were 3.8% and 5.9%. Clinical response (75%) and breast-conserving surgery rates (69%) were similar in both arms. Preoperative Endocrine Prognostic Index 0 scores (breast cancer-specific survival) were observed in 17.6% and 8.0% of patients in LETPAL and chemotherapy arms, respectively. Safety profile was as expected, with 2 versus 17 serious adverse events (including 11 grade 4 serious AEs in the chemotherapy arm).

Conclusion:

LETPAL combination was associated with poor pathological response but encouraging clinical and biomarker responses in Prosigna®-defined high-risk LBC. Contemporary chemotherapy regimen was associated with poor pathological and biomarker responses, with a much less favourable safety profile. LETPAL combination might represent an alternative to chemotherapy in early high-risk LBC. Clinical Trial Number NCT02400567.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piperazinas / Piridinas / Neoplasias da Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases / Letrozol Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piperazinas / Piridinas / Neoplasias da Mama / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Antineoplásicos Hormonais / Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases / Letrozol Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Ann Oncol Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article