Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Applying the theory of planned behavior to examine adjuvant endocrine therapy adherence intentions.
Hurtado-de-Mendoza, Alejandra; Carrera, Pilar; Parrott, W Gerrod; Gómez-Trillos, Sara; Perera, Robert A; Sheppard, Vanessa B.
Afiliação
  • Hurtado-de-Mendoza A; Cancer Prevention and Control, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Carrera P; Department of Social Psychology and Methodology, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
  • Parrott WG; Department of Psychology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Gómez-Trillos S; Cancer Prevention and Control, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA.
  • Perera RA; Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
  • Sheppard VB; Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.
Psychooncology ; 28(1): 187-194, 2019 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30353610
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) in breast cancer survivors is suboptimal. Using the theory of planned behavior (TPB), this study aimed to identify the strongest predictors from the TPB of AET intentions and past behavior and assessed whether ambivalence and anticipatory emotions increased the predictive capacity of TPB.

METHODS:

Two hundred eighty women diagnosed with hormone positive (HR+) breast cancer who filled at least one prescription of AET responded to a survey measuring TPB constructs, attitudinal ambivalence, and anticipatory emotions. The outcomes were intentions to adhere to AET and past medication adherence (previous 2 weeks).

RESULTS:

The TPB explained 66% of intentions to adhere to AET (P < 0.001). Ambivalence did not improve the TPB model's predictive value. When emotions were included with TPB, the model explained 70% of adherence intentions F11,226  = 52.84, P < 0.001 (R2c  = .70). This increase of 4% in predictability was statistically significant (ΔR2  = 0.04), F6, 226  = 7.90, P < 0.001. Women who self-reported nonadherence in the past 2 weeks differed significantly in the TPB variables, ambivalence, and anticipatory emotions from adherent women. Nonadherent participants reported lower-future intentions to adhere F1, 236  = 5.63, P = 0.018.

CONCLUSIONS:

Results suggest key concepts, such as anticipatory positive emotions that should be addressed in future interventions to enhance AET adherence and survivorship.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Adesão à Medicação / Sobreviventes de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Psychooncology Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Mama / Adesão à Medicação / Sobreviventes de Câncer Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Psychooncology Assunto da revista: NEOPLASIAS / PSICOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos