Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Rate control and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and obstructive lung disease.
You, Seng Chan; An, Min Ho; Yoon, Dukyong; Ban, Ga-Young; Yang, Pil-Sung; Yu, Hee Tae; Park, Rae Woong; Joung, Boyoung.
Afiliação
  • You SC; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  • An MH; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  • Yoon D; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  • Ban GY; Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  • Yang PS; Division of Cardiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Yu HT; Division of Cardiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • Park RW; Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Ajou University Graduate School of Medicine, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
  • Joung B; Division of Cardiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: cby6908@yuhs.ac.
Heart Rhythm ; 15(12): 1825-1832, 2018 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30509364
BACKGROUND: Rate-control medications are considered first-line treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, obstructive lung disease (OLD), a condition prevalent in those with AF, often makes it difficult to use those medications because of the lack of studies on new-onset AF in patients with OLD. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate clinical outcomes after administration of each class of rate-control medication in patients with concomitant AF and OLD (AF-OLD). METHODS: This study used the entire database provided by the National Health Insurance Service from 2002 to 2015. Risk of all-cause mortality was compared between use of calcium channel blocker (CCB) and use of other drug classes in AF-OLD patients using Cox regression analyses after propensity score matching. RESULTS: Among the 13,111 patients, the number of AF-OLD patients treated with a CCB, cardioselective ß-blocker (BB), nonselective BB, and digoxin was 2482, 2379, 2255, and 5995, respectively. The risk of mortality was lower with use of selective BB (hazard ratio [HR] 0.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-0.94; P = .002) and nonselective BB (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.77-0.95; P = .003) compared to use of CCBs. Digoxin use was related with worse survival, with marginal statistical significance (HR 1.09; 95% CI 1.00-1.18; P = .053). CONCLUSION: Among patients with AF-OLD, rate-control treatment using selective and nonselective BB was associated with a significant reduction in mortality compared with CCB use. Further prospective randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta / Digoxina / Frequência Cardíaca / Pneumopatias Obstrutivas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Heart Rhythm Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fibrilação Atrial / Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta / Digoxina / Frequência Cardíaca / Pneumopatias Obstrutivas Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male País/Região como assunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Heart Rhythm Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article