Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Non-invasive machine learning estimation of effort differentiates sleep-disordered breathing pathology.
Hanif, Umaer; Schneider, Logan D; Trap, Lotte; Leary, Eileen B; Moore, Hyatt; Guilleminault, Christian; Jennum, Poul; Sorensen, Helge B D; Mignot, Emmanuel J M.
Afiliação
  • Hanif U; Stanford Center for Sleep Sciences and Medicine, Stanford University, 3165 Porter Drive, MC 5480, Palo Alto, CA 94304-5480, United States of America. Danish Center for Sleep Medicine, Department of Clinical Neurophysiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Glostrup, Denmark. Biomedical Engineering, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Physiol Meas ; 40(2): 025008, 2019 02 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30736016
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Obstructive sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) events, unlike central events, are associated with increased respiratory effort. Esophageal pressure (P es) monitoring is the gold standard for measuring respiratory effort, but it is typically poorly tolerated because of its invasive nature. The objective was to investigate whether machine learning can be applied to routinely collected non-invasive, polysomnography (PSG) measures to accurately model peak negative P es.

APPROACH:

One thousand one hundred and nineteen patients from the Stanford Sleep Clinic with PSGs containing P es served as the sample. The selected non-invasive PSG signals included nasal pressure, oral airflow, thoracoabdominal effort, and snoring. A long short-term memory neural network was implemented to achieve a context-based mapping between the non-invasive features and the P es values. A hold-out dataset served as a prospective validation of the algorithm without needing to undertake a costly new study with the impractically invasive P es. MAIN

RESULTS:

The median difference between the measured and predicted P es was 0.61 cmH2O with an interquartile range (IQR) of 2.99 cmH2O and 5th and 95th percentiles of -5.85 cmH2O and 5.47 cmH2O, respectively. The model performed well when compared to actual esophageal pressure signal (ρ median = 0.581, p  = 0.01; IQR = 0.298; ρ 5% = 0.106; ρ 95% = 0.843).

SIGNIFICANCE:

A significant difference in predicted P es was shown between normal breathing and all obstructive SDB events; whereas, central apneas did not significantly differ from normal breathing. The developed system may be used as a tool for quantifying respiratory effort from the existing clinical practice of PSG without the need for P es, improving characterization of SDB events as obstructive or not.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndromes da Apneia do Sono / Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador / Aprendizado de Máquina Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Physiol Meas Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA / ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndromes da Apneia do Sono / Processamento de Sinais Assistido por Computador / Aprendizado de Máquina Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Physiol Meas Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA / ENGENHARIA BIOMEDICA / FISIOLOGIA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Dinamarca