Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A randomized controlled trial of Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening (DILAFOL trial).
Saad, Antonio F; Villarreal, Josephine; Eid, Joe; Spencer, Nicholas; Ellis, Viviana; Hankins, Gary D; Saade, George R.
Afiliação
  • Saad AF; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX. Electronic address: afsaad@utmb.edu.
  • Villarreal J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX.
  • Eid J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX.
  • Spencer N; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX.
  • Ellis V; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX.
  • Hankins GD; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX.
  • Saade GR; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 220(3): 275.e1-275.e9, 2019 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30790569
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to test the hypothesis that Dilapan-S is not inferior to the Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening at term. STUDY DESIGN: Pregnant women ≥37 weeks scheduled for induction with unfavorable cervix (≤3 cm dilated and ≤60% effaced) were randomly assigned to 12 hours of either Foley balloon inflated with 60 mL saline or Dilapan-S for cervical ripening. If the cervix remained unfavorable, then 1 more round of the assigned dilator was used. Management following ripening was left up to the clinical providers. The primary outcome was vaginal delivery. A satisfaction survey was also obtained after the preinduction period. Sample size was based on a noninferiority margin of 10%, 90% power, and an estimated frequency of vaginal delivery of 71% in Foley balloon and 76% in Dilapan-S. RESULTS: From November 2016 through February 2018, 419 women were randomized (209 to Foley balloon; 210 to Dilapan-S). In the intent-to-treat analysis, vaginal delivery was more common in Dilapan-S vs Foley balloon (81.3% vs 76.1%), with an absolute difference with respect to the Foley balloon of 5.2% (95% confidence interval, -2.7% to 13.0%) indicating noninferiority for the prespecified margin. The difference was not large enough to show superiority. Noninferiority was confirmed in the per-protocol population (n = 204 in the Foley balloon, n = 188 in Dilapan-S), supporting the robustness of the results. Secondary outcomes were not different between groups, except for a longer time the device remained in place in Dilapan-S compared with the Foley balloon. Maternal and neonatal adverse events were not significantly different between groups. A priori interaction analyses showed no difference in the effect on vaginal delivery by cervical dilation at randomization, parity, or body mass index >30 kg/m2. Patients with Dilapan-S were more satisfied than patients with the Foley balloon as far as sleep (P = .01), relaxing time (P = .001), and performance of desired daily activities (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Dilapan-S is not inferior to the Foley balloon for preinduction cervical ripening at term. Advantages of Dilapan-S over Foley include Food and Drug Administration approval, safe profile, no protrusion from the introitus, no need to keep under tension, and better patient satisfaction.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Polímeros / Cateterismo / Maturidade Cervical / Trabalho de Parto Induzido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Am J Obstet Gynecol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Polímeros / Cateterismo / Maturidade Cervical / Trabalho de Parto Induzido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Revista: Am J Obstet Gynecol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article