Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Biosolids and Tillage Practices Influence Soil Bacterial Communities in Dryland Wheat.
Schlatter, Daniel C; Paul, Narayan C; Shah, Devendra H; Schillinger, William F; Bary, Andy I; Sharratt, Brenton; Paulitz, Timothy C.
Afiliação
  • Schlatter DC; Wheat Health, Genetics and Quality Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
  • Paul NC; Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
  • Shah DH; Department of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
  • Schillinger WF; Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
  • Bary AI; Puyallup Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Puyallup, WA, 98371, USA.
  • Sharratt B; Northwest Sustainable Agroecosystems Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA.
  • Paulitz TC; Wheat Health, Genetics and Quality Research Unit, USDA-ARS, Pullman, WA, 99164, USA. timothy.paulitz@ars.usda.gov.
Microb Ecol ; 78(3): 737-752, 2019 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30796467
Class B biosolids are used in dryland wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production in eastern Washington as a source of nutrients and to increase soil organic matter, but little is known about their effects on bacterial communities and potential for harboring human pathogens. Moreover, conservation tillage is promoted to reduce erosion and soil degradation. We explored the impacts of biosolids or synthetic fertilizer in combination with traditional (conventional) or conservation tillage on soil bacterial communities. Bacterial communities were characterized from fresh biosolids, biosolid aggregates embedded in soil, and soil after a second application of biosolids using high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Biosolid application significantly affected bacterial communities, even 4 years after their application. Bacteria in the families Clostridiaceae, Norcardiaceae, Anaerolinaceae, Dietziaceae, and Planococcaceae were more abundant in fresh biosolids, biosolid aggregates, and soils treated with biosolids than in synthetically fertilized soils. Taxa identified as Turcibacter, Dietzia, Clostridiaceae, and Anaerolineaceae were highly abundant in biosolid aggregates in the soil and likely originated from the biosolids. In contrast, Oxalobacteriaceae, Streptomyceteaceae, Janthinobacterium, Pseudomonas, Kribbella, and Bacillus were rare in the fresh biosolids, but relatively abundant in biosolid aggregates in the soil, and probably originated from the soil to colonize the substrate. However, tillage had relatively minor effects on bacterial communities, with only a small number of taxa differing in relative abundance between traditional and conventional tillage. Although biosolid-associated bacteria persisted in soil, potentially pathogenic taxa were extremely rare and no toxin genes for key groups (Salmonella, Clostridium) were detectable, suggesting that although fecal contamination was apparent via indicator taxa, pathogen populations had declined to low levels. Thus, biosolid amendments had profound effects on soil bacterial communities both by introducing gut- or digester-derived bacteria and by enriching potentially beneficial indigenous soil populations.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Microbiologia do Solo / Bactérias / Triticum País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Microb Ecol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Microbiologia do Solo / Bactérias / Triticum País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Microb Ecol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos