Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
NIST lipidomics workflow questionnaire: an assessment of community-wide methodologies and perspectives.
Bowden, John A; Ulmer, Candice Z; Jones, Christina M; Koelmel, Jeremy P; Yost, Richard A.
Afiliação
  • Bowden JA; Marine Biochemical Sciences Group, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Hollings Marine Laboratory, 331 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC, 29412, USA. john.bowden@nist.gov.
  • Ulmer CZ; Marine Biochemical Sciences Group, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Hollings Marine Laboratory, 331 Fort Johnson Road, Charleston, SC, 29412, USA.
  • Jones CM; Organic Chemical Measurement Science Group, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 100 Bureau Drive, Gaithersburg, MD, 20899, USA.
  • Koelmel JP; Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, 214 Leigh Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
  • Yost RA; Department of Chemistry, University of Florida, 214 Leigh Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA.
Metabolomics ; 14(5): 53, 2018 03 20.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30830346
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Efforts to harmonize lipidomic methodologies have been limited within the community. Here, we aimed to capitalize on the recent National Institute of Standards and Technology lipidomics interlaboratory comparison exercise by implementing a questionnaire that assessed current methodologies, quantitation strategies, standard operating procedures (SOPs), and quality control activities employed by the lipidomics community.

OBJECTIVES:

Lipidomics is a rapidly developing field with diverse applications. At present, there are no community-vetted methods to assess measurement comparability or data quality. Thus, a major impetus of this questionnaire was to profile current efforts, highlight areas of need, and establish future objectives in an effort to harmonize lipidomics workflows.

METHODS:

The 54-question survey inquired about laboratory demographics, lipidomic methodologies and SOPs, analytical platforms, quantitation, reference materials, quality control procedures, and opinions regarding challenges existing within the community.

RESULTS:

A total of 125 laboratories participated in the questionnaire. A broad overview of results highlighted a wide methodological diversity within current lipidomic workflows. The impact of this diversity on lipid measurement and quantitation is currently unknown and needs to be explored further. While some laboratories do incorporate SOPs and quality control activities, these concepts have not been fully embraced by the community. The top five perceived challenges within the lipidomics community were a lack of standardization amongst methods/protocols, lack of lipid standards, software/data handling and quantification, and over-reporting/false positives.

CONCLUSION:

The questionnaire provided an overview of current lipidomics methodologies and further promoted the need for community-accepted guidelines and protocols. The questionnaire also served as a platform to help determine and prioritize metrological issues to be investigated.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Referência / Lipídeos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Metabolomics Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Referência / Lipídeos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Metabolomics Ano de publicação: 2018 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Estados Unidos