Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Activity-Based Cost Analysis of Including Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) in the Diagnostic Pathway of Focal Pancreatic Lesions Detected by Abdominal Ultrasound.
Faccioli, Niccolò; Dietrich, Christoph F; Foti, Giovanni; Santi, Elena; Comai, Alessio; D'Onofrio, Mirko.
Afiliação
  • Faccioli N; Radiology, University of Verona, Italy.
  • Dietrich CF; Medizinische Klinik 2, Caritas-Krankenhaus, Bad Mergentheim, Germany.
  • Foti G; Radiology, IRCCS Sacro Cuore Don Calabria Hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy.
  • Santi E; Radiology, University of Verona, Italy.
  • Comai A; Radiology, University of Verona, Italy.
  • D'Onofrio M; Radiology, University of Verona, Italy.
Ultraschall Med ; 40(5): 618-624, 2019 Oct.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30895585
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To perform an activity-based cost analysis of the inclusion of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnostic pathway of newly detected focal pancreatic lesions revealed by abdominal ultrasound (US) in comparison to computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Over a 14-year period, 977 patients with newly detected focal pancreatic lesions on US and subsequently studied with CEUS and/or CT and MRI were included. The cost of equipment, materials and human resources for every imaging method was calculated. We analyzed the costs in different scenarios considering whether or not CT or MRI was required in the diagnostic pathway. The savings (R) were calculated by subtracting the differential cost of CEUS from the eliminated third-level exam (CCEUS CEUS cost; CCT CT cost; CMRI MRI cost) compared to conventional ultrasound (CCEUS-CUS) R = CCT-(CCEUS-CUS) or R = CMRI-(CCEUS-CUS).

RESULTS:

Total costs were US 28.39 €; CEUS 70.50 €; CT 106.23 €; MRI 219.61 €. In 388/563 patients CEUS characterized the pancreatic lesion as solid, with only CT being performed as a second-level investigation the savings were 68 870.36 €. In 266/414 patients CEUS diagnosed lesions as cystic, with only MRI being performed as a second-level examination the savings were 16 825.07 €. Considering the whole diagnostic pathway of the patients, the cost savings were 76 809.35 € for solid lesions and 26 242.49 € for cystic lesions, with overall savings of 103 051.84 €.

CONCLUSION:

CEUS represents a cost-effective imaging method for the differentiation of focal pancreatic lesions and could guide the selection of the best imaging modality for preoperative assessment, thereby optimizing resources and securing the diagnostic pathway.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pâncreas / Ultrassonografia / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ultraschall Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pâncreas / Ultrassonografia / Meios de Contraste Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Ultraschall Med Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Itália