Early and Late Outcome of Common Iliac Aneurysms Treated by Flared Limbs or Iliac Branch Devices during Endovascular Aortic Repair.

PURPOSE: To compare perioperative and long-term outcomes of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) with flared limbs (FLs) vs iliac branch devices (IBDs) for common iliac artery aneurysm to determine possible differences in outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2012 to 2017, all patients with standard EVAR with FLs and aortoiliac anatomy fit for implantation of IBDs were retrospectively selected and compared with patients with standard EVAR and IBDs. The study included 150 patients with 162 iliac treatments: 105 (65%) FLs and 57 (35%) IBDs. Iliac complications (ICs), including internal iliac artery (IIA) loss, limb thrombosis, and type 1b or type 3 endoleak, were considered at 30 days and in the follow-up period. RESULTS: Procedural time and volume of contrast medium were significantly higher in IBD vs FL procedures (90 min ± 33 vs 70 min ± 25, P = .01; 130 mL ± 40 vs 80 mL ± 20, P = .01). Perioperative rate of ICs was similar between IBDs and FLs (0% vs 3.8% [4 IIA loss], P = .25). During 35-month median follow-up, there were 10 ICs, all in FLs group (4 IIA perioperative loss, 4 type 1b endoleak, 2 limb occlusion). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, survival free of ICs was significantly higher in IBD group after 4 years of follow-up (1 y 100% vs 96%, P = .36; 2 y 100% vs 94%, P = .14; 3 y 100% vs 91%, P = .07; 4 y 100% vs 87%, P = .03; 5 y 100% vs 78%, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: IBDs and FLs have similar perioperative results. IBDs require longer procedural time and greater contrast medium volume; however, they are associated with lower ICs after 4 years of follow-up.