Device Malfunctions and Complications Associated with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Surgery: Review of the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.
J Endourol
; 33(6): 448-454, 2019 06.
Article
em En
| MEDLINE
| ID: mdl-30990073
ABSTRACT
Introduction and Objectives:
Multiple surgical therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) have been developed to decrease complications and increase provider efficiency. We investigated contemporary BPH treatment device-related adverse events by searching a publicly available database. Materials andMethods:
The Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database was queried for contemporary BPH treatments. All devices were evaluated for malfunction, patient complications, and manufacturer review. The MAUDE adverse event classification system was used to standardize complications. Univariate analysis was performed to identify associations between BPH devices and adverse events.Results:
A total of 2567 reports were identified transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) 197 (7.67%), holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) 39 (1.52%), GreenLight™ 2315 (90.2%), and UroLift® 16 (0.62%). The most common deviations for each modality included cutting loop detachment during TURP 116 (58.9%), morcellator dysfunction for HoLEP 23 (58.9%), tip fracture/detachment for GreenLight (68.8%), and failure to deploy during UroLift 10 (62.5%). Only 18 (0.7%) patients required medical/surgical management (MAUDE II-IV) due to a device complication. No significant relationship was seen between each modality and complications; however, morcellator use (27.8%) was observed in higher grade complications. Manufacturer review occurred in 61.7% of cases, with 41.3% of reviewed cases finding the operator the cause of the malfunction.Conclusion:
Each BPH modality investigated had minimal patient harm with over 99% of patients experiencing no complication after device malfunction. Of note, great care should be taken with morcellator use during HoLEP as it had the greatest number of MAUDE II to IV complications among all devices. Manufacturer review revealed that over 40% of cases were due to misuse by the user. Therefore, urologists should select the modalities they are most familiar with to decrease patient harm and prevent device malfunctions.Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
1
Base de dados:
MEDLINE
Assunto principal:
Hiperplasia Prostática
/
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Urológicos
/
Ressecção Transuretral da Próstata
/
Falha de Equipamento
/
Terapia a Laser
/
Lasers de Estado Sólido
Tipo de estudo:
Prognostic_studies
/
Risk_factors_studies
Limite:
Humans
/
Male
Idioma:
En
Revista:
J Endourol
Assunto da revista:
UROLOGIA
Ano de publicação:
2019
Tipo de documento:
Article