Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy of pharmacological therapies in patients with IBS with diarrhoea or mixed stool pattern: systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Black, Christopher J; Burr, Nicholas E; Camilleri, Michael; Earnest, David L; Quigley, Eamonn Mm; Moayyedi, Paul; Houghton, Lesley A; Ford, Alexander C.
Afiliação
  • Black CJ; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Burr NE; Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
  • Camilleri M; Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Earnest DL; Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
  • Quigley EM; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
  • Moayyedi P; Division of Gastroenterology, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
  • Houghton LA; Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Methodist Hospital, Weill Cornell Medical College, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • Ford AC; Department of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Gut ; 69(1): 74-82, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30996042
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Over half of patients with IBS have either diarrhoea (IBS-D) or a mixed stool pattern (IBS-M). The relative efficacy of licenced pharmacological therapies is unclear in the absence of head-to-head trials. We conducted a network meta-analysis to resolve this uncertainty.

DESIGN:

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Embase Classic, the Cochrane central register of controlled trials, and Clinicaltrials.gov through January 2019 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the efficacy of licenced pharmacological therapies (alosetron, eluxadoline, ramosetron and rifaximin) in adults with IBS-D or IBS-M. Trials included in the analysis reported a dichotomous assessment of overall response to therapy, and data were pooled using a random effects model. Efficacy and safety of all pharmacological therapies were reported as a pooled relative risk with 95% CIs to summarise the effect of each comparison tested. Treatments were ranked according to their p score.

RESULTS:

We identified 18 eligible RCTs (seven alosetron, five ramosetron, two rifaximin and four eluxadoline), containing 9844 patients. All were superior to placebo for the treatment of IBS-D or IBS-M at 12 weeks, according to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recommended endpoint for trials in IBS. Alosetron 1 mg twice daily was ranked first for efficacy, based on the FDA-recommended composite endpoint of improvement in both abdominal pain and stool consistency, effect on global symptoms of IBS and effect on stool consistency. Ramosetron 2.5µg once daily was ranked first for effect on abdominal pain. Total numbers of adverse events were significantly greater with alosetron 1 mg twice daily and ramosetron 2.5µg once daily, compared with placebo. Rifaximin 550 mg three times daily ranked first for safety. Constipation was significantly more common with all drugs, except rifaximin 550 mg three times daily.

CONCLUSION:

In a network meta-analysis of RCTs of pharmacological therapies for IBS-D and IBS-M, we found all drugs to be superior to placebo, but alosetron and ramosetron appeared to be the most effective.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fármacos Gastrointestinais / Síndrome do Intestino Irritável / Diarreia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gut Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Fármacos Gastrointestinais / Síndrome do Intestino Irritável / Diarreia Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Gut Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Reino Unido