Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post-hoc analyses of a randomized, double-blind, phase III study.
Shi, Li Xin; Liu, Xiao Min; Shi, Yong Quan; Li, Quan Min; Ma, Jian Hua; Li, Yan Bing; Du, Li Ying; Wang, Feng; Chen, Lu Lu.
Afiliação
  • Shi LX; Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, China.
  • Liu XM; Department of Endocrinology, First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China.
  • Shi YQ; Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China.
  • Li QM; Beijing 262 Hospital, Beijing, China.
  • Ma JH; Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing, China.
  • Li YB; The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun-Yat Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Du LY; Lilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China.
  • Wang F; Lilly Suzhou Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China.
  • Chen LL; Department of Endocrinology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
J Diabetes Investig ; 11(1): 142-150, 2020 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31102326
ABSTRACT
AIMS/

INTRODUCTION:

To investigate the efficacy/safety of dulaglutide once-weekly monotherapy versus glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

This was a post-hoc analysis of a Chinese randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority, phase III study. Patients (n = 572) with inadequate glycemic control received dulaglutide 1.5 mg (n = 189) or 0.75 mg (n = 194) once-weekly or glimepiride (1-3 mg/day; n = 189) for 26 weeks. The primary objective of the study was to investigate the non-inferiority of dulaglutide 1.5 mg versus glimepiride by the change from baseline to week 26 in glycated hemoglobin (non-inferiority margin 0.4%).

RESULTS:

Dulaglutide 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg were non-inferior (P < 0.001) and superior (P ≤ 0.002) versus glimepiride for the change in glycated hemoglobin from baseline to week 26. The least-squares mean differences (95% confidence interval) versus glimepiride were dulaglutide 1.5 mg, -0.53% (-0.74, -0.32) and dulaglutide 0.75 mg, -0.32% (-0.53, -0.12). Significantly more patients attained glycated hemoglobin <7.0% at week 26 in the dulaglutide 1.5 mg (71.7%) versus the glimepiride (57.5%; P = 0.005) group. The decrease from baseline to week 26 in fasting blood glucose was significantly more pronounced in both the dulaglutide groups versus the glimepiride group (P < 0.01). The overall incidence and rate of hypoglycemia were lower in both of the dulaglutide groups versus the glimepiride group. At week 26, bodyweight had increased from baseline in the glimepiride group and decreased from baseline in both dulaglutide groups. The most frequent gastrointestinal drug-related adverse events with dulaglutide were diarrhea, abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings support once-weekly dulaglutide monotherapy as a treatment for Chinese patients with early stage type 2 diabetes.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos de Sulfonilureia / Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão / Fragmentos Fc das Imunoglobulinas / Biomarcadores / Povo Asiático / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon / Hipoglicemiantes Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Diabetes Investig Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Compostos de Sulfonilureia / Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão / Fragmentos Fc das Imunoglobulinas / Biomarcadores / Povo Asiático / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 / Peptídeos Semelhantes ao Glucagon / Hipoglicemiantes Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Diabetes Investig Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China