[Is a routine second transurethral resection of the bladder still necessary after hexaminolévulinate photodynamic diagnosis-assisted TURBT?] / La résection transurétrale de vessie de réévaluation est-elle toujours nécessaire en cas de primo-résection sous luminofluorescence par hexaminolévulinate ?

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to assess the impact of blue light cystoscopy with hexaminolevulinate on residual tumor rates at second-look transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Among all patients undergoing TURB in our center between 2012 and 2017, 52 patients had a second-look after a first complete TURB with a delay<3months. We compare patients with standard white light cystoscopy/TURB then second-look blue light cystoscopy/re-TURB (group A, n=30) and patients with blue light cystoscopy/TURB at the initial procedure then white light cystoscopy/re-TURB (group B, n=22). The residual tumor rates at second-look, restaging and changing in therapeutic strategy, as well as recurrence free survival and progression rate were compared. RESULTS: Residual tumor at the time of second-look cystoscopy was detected in 42.3% of cases in our cohort, with a significant difference between the two groups (63.3% in group A versus 0% in group B, <0.001). In group A, 16.7% (5/30) of patients had upstaging and/or upgrading at second-look cystoscopy, resulting in a change in therapeutic strategy in most cases (4/5) while none upstaging was observed in group B. In multivariate analysis, the use of luminofluorescence at the first TURB was the only independent predictive factor of residual tumor (P=0.0031). CONCLUSION: The quality of the initial TURB, when performed by using blue light cystoscopy, had a significant impact on the rate of residual tumor at the second-look resection and could modify therapeutic strategy of NMIBC. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.