Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Quantitative evaluation of breast density using a dual-energy technique on a digital breast tomosynthesis system.
Lu, Kun-Mu; Yeh, Da-Ming; Cao, Bi-Hui; Lin, Chia-Yi; Liang, Chih-Yu; Zhou, Yu-Bo; Tsai, Chia-Jung.
Afiliação
  • Lu KM; Department of Radiology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei City, Taiwan.
  • Yeh DM; Department of Medical Imaging, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan.
  • Cao BH; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung City, Taiwan.
  • Lin CY; Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
  • Liang CY; Department of Medical Imaging, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan.
  • Zhou YB; Department of Information Engineering, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
  • Tsai CJ; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 20(6): 170-177, 2019 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31106990
PURPOSE: Although breast density is considered a strong risk factor of breast cancer, its quantitative assessment is difficult. To investigate a quantitative method of measuring breast density using dual-energy mammographic imaging with central digital breast tomosynthesis in physically uniform and nonuniform phantoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The dual-energy imaging unit used a tungsten anode and silver filter with 30 kVp for high-energy images and 20 kVp for low-energy images. Uniform glandular-equivalent phantoms were used to calibrate a dual-energy based decomposition algorithm. The first study used uniform breast phantoms which ranged in thicknesses from 20 to 70 mm, in 10-mm increments, and which provided 30%, 50%, and 70% of breast density. The second study used uniform phantoms ranging from 10% to 90% of breast density. The third study used non-uniform phantoms (at an average density of 50%) with a thickness which ranged from 20 to 90 mm, in 10-mm increments. RESULTS: The root mean square error of breast density measurements was 2.64-3.34% for the uniform, variable thickness phantoms, 4.17% for the uniform, variable density phantoms, and 4.49% for the nonuniform, variable thickness phantoms. CONCLUSION: The dual-energy technique could be used to measure breast density with a margin of error of < 10% using digital breast tomosynthesis.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mama / Mamografia / Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador / Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica / Imagens de Fantasmas / Densidade da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Mama / Mamografia / Interpretação de Imagem Radiográfica Assistida por Computador / Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica / Imagens de Fantasmas / Densidade da Mama Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans Idioma: En Revista: J Appl Clin Med Phys Assunto da revista: BIOFISICA Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Taiwan