Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predictors of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation in patients with class I indications: the markedly dilated left ventricular end-diastolic dimension and the presence of fragmented QRS.
Hu, Yi-Ran; Hua, Wei; Yang, Sheng-Wen; Gu, Min; Niu, Hong-Xia; Ding, Li-Gang; Wang, Jing; Jing, Ran; Fan, Xiao-Han; Zhang, Shu.
Afiliação
  • Hu YR; State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital; National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Hua W; State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital; National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Yang SW; State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital; National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Gu M; State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital; National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Niu HX; State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital; National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Ding LG; State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital; National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Wang J; State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital; National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Jing R; State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital; National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Fan XH; State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital; National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  • Zhang S; State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Arrhythmia Center, Fuwai Hospital; National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
J Geriatr Cardiol ; 16(7): 514-521, 2019 Jul.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31447890
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is a highly effective treatment in patients with a class I recommendation. However, a small proportion of the strictly selected patients still fail to respond. This study was designed to identify predictors of non-response in patients with class I indications for CRT and determine the non-response probability of the patients.

METHODS:

A total of 296 consecutive patients with a class I recommendation received CRT from January 2009 to January 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify predictors for non-response (defined as cardiac death, heart transplantation, or HF hospitalization during 1-year follow-up).

RESULTS:

Among 296 patients, 30 (10.1%) met non-response. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that non-response to CRT was associated with a fragmented QRS (odd ratio (OR) = 2.86, 95% CI 1.14-7.12; P = 0.025) and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) ≥ 77 mm (OR = 3.02, 95% CI 1.17-7.82; P = 0.022). Patients with both of the predictors had a non-response probability of 46.2% (95% CI 19.1%-73.3%).

CONCLUSION:

In patients with left bundle branch block and wider QRS duration, the proportion of non-response to CRT is not low in real world. The presence of the dilated LVEDD or fragmented QRS is a strong predictor of non-response to CRT. The probability of non-response in the patients with the two predictors was 46.2%.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Geriatr Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Idioma: En Revista: J Geriatr Cardiol Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: China