Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Breast Cancer Chemoprevention: A Practical Guide for the Primary Care Provider.
Farkas, Amy; Vanderberg, Rachel; Merriam, Sarah; DiNardo, Deborah.
Afiliação
  • Farkas A; Division of General Internal Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • Vanderberg R; Department of Medicine, Clement Zablocki Milwaukee VA Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • Merriam S; Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  • DiNardo D; Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
J Womens Health (Larchmt) ; 29(1): 46-56, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31560601
ABSTRACT
Several organizations, including the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and the United States Preventive Services Task Force, recommend incorporation of breast cancer risk-based counseling and chemoprevention into routine well-woman care. However, primary care providers report both discomfort with and a lack of medical knowledge on this topic. In this review we present a practical, evidence-based guide for incorporating breast cancer risk assessment and chemoprevention into routine care. We advocate a stepwise approach consisting of (1) risk assessment and communication, (2) selection of appropriate chemoprevention based on risk-benefit analysis, (3) shared decision-making regarding chemoprevention, and (4) management of chemoprevention side effects. We encourage providers to identify high-risk women and refer them to genetic counseling or a high-risk breast cancer clinic. For women who are not considered high risk, we suggest using the Gail model to estimate a woman's 5-year risk of invasive breast cancer. Usually, the benefits of chemoprevention outweigh the risks of chemoprevention once a woman's 5-year risk of invasive breast cancer reaches 3%. For these women there are several factors that need to be considered when selecting a chemoprevention agent, including patient preference, thrombotic history, menopausal status, absence or presence of a uterus, and bone mineral density. We advocate an evidence-based shared decision-making approach that reflects the woman's individual preferences when communicating risk and counseling about chemoprevention. After starting a chemoprevention agent, close follow-up is important as side effects of chemoprevention are common, including vasomotor symptoms and arthralgias. We also review evidence-based management of chemoprevention side effects.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Neoplasias da Mama / Quimioprevenção / Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico / Inibidores da Aromatase Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / SAUDE DA MULHER Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Atenção Primária à Saúde / Neoplasias da Mama / Quimioprevenção / Moduladores Seletivos de Receptor Estrogênico / Inibidores da Aromatase Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Womens Health (Larchmt) Assunto da revista: GINECOLOGIA / SAUDE DA MULHER Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article