Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparing Changes in Controlled Substance Prescribing Trends by Provider Type.
Meadows, Amy L; Strickland, Justin C; Qalbani, Shiraz; Conner, Kailyn L; Su, Amanda; Rush, Craig R.
Afiliação
  • Meadows AL; Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Strickland JC; Department of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Qalbani S; River Valley Behavioral Health, Owensboro, Kentucky.
  • Conner KL; College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Su A; College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
  • Rush CR; Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky.
Am J Addict ; 29(1): 35-42, 2020 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31600029
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES:

Forty-nine out of 50 states have implemented Prescription Drug Monitoring Programs (PDMPs) to monitor controlled substance (CS) prescribing. PDMPs change health care provider behavior, but few studies have examined changes in CS prescription by health care provider type.

METHODS:

Aggregated yearly data, including number of CS prescriptions, doses, and doses per prescription by health care provider type (physician, advanced practice registered nurse [APRN], and dentist) for each year from 2011 to 2017 was provided by the state PDMP, Kentucky All Schedule Prescription Electronic Reporting System (KASPER). In aggregate, this data set included 64,578,307 total prescriptions and 3,982,130,994 total doses of Schedule II-V medications.

RESULTS:

Physicians and dentists showed a trend of decreasing prescriptions and doses for Schedule II opioids from 2012 to 2017 (27-32% reduction in 2017 compared to 2011). APRNs showed a substantive increase in the number of doses and prescriptions (121-204% increase in 2017 compared to 2011), with increases remaining when controlling for number of providers. Physicians increased doses and prescriptions of Schedule II stimulants (37% increase for both doses and prescriptions), but by a smaller magnitude than APRN increases in stimulants (334-360% increase). Dentists showed decreases in Schedule II stimulants prescribed (69-80% reduction). Similar trends, but more modest in magnitude, were observed for Schedule III-IV. DISCUSSION AND

CONCLUSIONS:

Although monitoring and continuing education requirements are similar across all providers in Kentucky, differences in prescription trends for Schedule II opioids and stimulants were noted for physicians, APRNs, and dentists. SCIENTIFIC

SIGNIFICANCE:

Changes in prescribing following introduction of mandatory use of KASPER markedly differed based on provider type, with increases observed for APRNs compared with physicians and dentists. These findings advance prior research by providing a detailed examination of prescribing trends by provider type subsequent to a PDMPs mandatory use law. (Am J Addict 2019;0000-00).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Substâncias Controladas / Programas de Monitoramento de Prescrição de Medicamentos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Addict Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Padrões de Prática Médica / Substâncias Controladas / Programas de Monitoramento de Prescrição de Medicamentos Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans País/Região como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Am J Addict Assunto da revista: TRANSTORNOS RELACIONADOS COM SUBSTANCIAS Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article