Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Bone Mineral Density Response With Denosumab in Combination With Standard or High-Dose Teriparatide: The DATA-HD RCT.
Ramchand, Sabashini K; David, Natalie L; Leder, Benjamin Z; Tsai, Joy N.
Afiliação
  • Ramchand SK; Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
  • David NL; Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Austin Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
  • Leder BZ; Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
  • Tsai JN; Department of Medicine, Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab ; 105(3)2020 03 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31674641
ABSTRACT
CONTEXT In the Denosumab and High-Dose Teriparatide Administration (DATA-HD) study, we reported that 15 months of combined high-dose (HD) teriparatide and denosumab increased mean areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the hip and spine more than combined denosumab and standard-dose (SD) teriparatide.

OBJECTIVE:

In the current analysis, we compare the individual rates of aBMD response between the treatment groups.

DESIGN:

Single-site, open-label, randomized controlled trial in which postmenopausal women received either teriparatide 20-µg daily (SD) or 40-µg daily (HD) given months 0 through 9, overlapped with denosumab 60 mg, given months 3 through 15 (15 months' total duration). The proportion of participants in the SD and HD groups experiencing total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine aBMD gains of >3%, >6%, and >9% were compared.

PARTICIPANTS:

Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis completing all study visits (n = 60). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) aBMD (dual x-ray absorptiometry).

RESULTS:

At the end of the 15-month treatment period, a higher proportion of women in the HD group had aBMD increases >3% (83% vs. 58%, P = .037) and >6% (45% vs. 19%, P = .034) at the total hip, and >3% at the femoral neck (86% vs. 63%, P = .044). At the lumbar spine, >3% response rates were similar, whereas the >6% and >9% response rates were greater in the HD group (100% vs. 79%, P = .012 and 93% vs. 59%, P = .003, respectively).

CONCLUSION:

Compared with the SD regimen, more women treated with the HD regimen achieved clinically meaningful and rapid gains in hip and spine aBMD. These results suggest that this approach may provide unique benefits in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Densidade Óssea / Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa / Teriparatida / Conservadores da Densidade Óssea / Denosumab Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Marrocos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Densidade Óssea / Osteoporose Pós-Menopausa / Teriparatida / Conservadores da Densidade Óssea / Denosumab Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article País de afiliação: Marrocos